Cited by 43Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot LearningECG Monitoring and AnalysisMachine Learning in Healthcare

Applications of Self-Supervised Learning to Biomedical Signals: A Survey

Open access
Pup, Federico Del, Atzori, Manfredo·2023·IEEE Access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Over the last decade, deep learning applications in biomedical research have exploded, demonstrating their ability to often outperform previous machine learning approaches in various tasks. However, training deep learning models for biomedical applications requires large amounts of data annotated by experts, whose collection is often time- and cost- prohibitive. Self-Supervised Learning (SSL) has emerged as a prominent solution for such problem, as it allows to learn powerful representations from vast unlabeled data by producing supervisory signals directly from the data. The high amount of recent works employing the self-supervised learning paradigm for the analysis of biomedical signals (biosignals) can make it difficult for researchers to have a complete picture of the current research state. Therefore, this paper aims at outlining and clarifying the state-of-the-art in the domain. The article: briefly summarizes the nature and acquisition modality of the main biosignals; introduces the self-supervised learning method, focusing on the different pretraining strategies; provides a concise overview of the works employing SSL for the analysis of different types of biosignals; provides an overall analysis of critical aspects to consider when employing SSL to biosignals, also highlighting current open challenges. The analysis of the scientific literature highlights the importance of SSL, confirming its potential to improve models’ performance and robustness, and to promote the integration of deep learning into clinical tasks.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2023.3344531

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Pup, F. D., & Atzori, M.
Affiliations
University of Padua (IT)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2023
Volume
11
Pages
144180-144203
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4389897587
Cited by
43
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 8
FWCI
4.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Union (EU)-NextGenerationEU Program
  • Stars@UNIPD-Project: MedMax
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › ECG Monitoring and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
self-supervised learning, physiological signals, pre-training strategies, unlabeled data, representation learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review