Cited by 42Prosthetics and Rehabilitation RoboticsMuscle activation and electromyography studiesStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 174 of the 175 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Deep Learning Approaches for Enhanced Lower-Limb Exoskeleton Control: A Review

Open access

Abstract

Recent advancements in robotics have pushed the development of active exoskeletons and orthoses for assistive, augmentative, and rehabilitative purposes. Deep Learning approaches, particularly in motion analysis and prediction, hold promise for enhanced control of lower limb exoskeletons, offering the potential for improved outcomes in assistive and rehabilitative interventions. This review paper explores recent advancements in deep learning approaches for controlling lower limb exoskeletons. The study encompasses papers published from 2018 to the present, focusing on various aspects of deep learning models, including recognition, prediction, and other related tasks. The paper includes 103 papers covering various tasks and parameters like the gait phase, kinematics, and kinetics of the lower limb exoskeleton. Each aspect is thoroughly examined, highlighting the parameters utilized in the respective models. Moreover, the results obtained from these approaches are evaluated and compared against classical control strategies, shedding light on their effectiveness and potential benefits. The review also addresses the limitations of current deep learning techniques in lower limb exoskeleton control and outlines potential avenues for future research and improvement. By consolidating the latest findings and advancements in this field, this review paper provides valuable insights into the application of deep learning in the control of lower limb exoskeletons, paving the way for enhanced rehabilitation and assistive technologies in the future.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2024.3414175

Cites

174 of 174 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 175 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 2023, World Health Organization
  2. 2023, World Stroke Organization
  3. 2022, The Rewalk Exoskeleton
  4. 2022, The Lokomat Exoskeleton
  5. Hasan, 2022, Deep learning technology-based exoskeleton robot controller development
  6. Ibrahim, 2023, FocalGatedNet: A novel deep learning model for accurate knee joint angle prediction

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Belal, M., Alsheikh, N., Aljarah, A., & Hussain, I.
Affiliations
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2024
Volume
12
Pages
143883-143907
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4399618574
Cited by
42
References
175
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 6
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Advanced Research and Innovation Center (ARIC), jointly funded by Mubadala, United Arab Emirates (UAE) Clusters, and the Khalifa University of Science and Technology (8436010)
  • Khalifa University Center for Autonomous and Robotic Systems (RC1-2018-KUCARS)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
lower limb exoskeleton, exoskeleton control, deep learning, gait phase detection, gait kinematics, gait kinetics, motion prediction, rehabilitation robotics, assistive technology, orthoses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review