Chart Accessibility: A Review of Current Alt Text Generation
Open accessAbstract
Charts are valuable visual representations of data, provide an easy overview, and reveal important aspects of the data, such as trends and outliers, which are usually difficult to notice in textual representations. Charts are important for sighted readers but are inaccessible to screen reader users without the help of alternative text (alt text). Thus far, alt text has to be written manually, but recent advancements in deep learning models can support this process by relying on automatic chart understanding models. While numerous studies have explored automatic chart understanding tasks, there remains a lack of comprehensive reviews specifically focused on automatic alt text generation for screen reader users. In this study, we collected 38 papers and reviewed them according to the alt text generation workflow: target alt text content, methods for automatic alt text generation, and available applications that can assist alt text generation. Furthermore, we discuss the remaining challenges and outline the directions for future research in this field. This study is the first comprehensive survey that specifically focuses on the generation of alt text for impaired individuals. It serves as a resourceful overview for researchers and practitioners working on alt text generation, emphasizing the need for the continued development of chart accessibility.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research has explored methods to automate alt text creation, but has yielded mixed results.
“Research has explored methods to automate alt text creation, but has yielded mixed results [30, 52, 81, 85].”
From How University Disability Services Professionals Write Image Descriptions for HCI Figures Using Generative AI (2026) · cites this paper as [85]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 83 · Cited by 5
- Authors
- Yan, C., Hutter, H.-P., Schmitt-Koopmann, F. M., & Darvishy, A.
- Affiliations
- ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH)
- Institute of Computer Science, Zurich University of Applied Sciences (ZHAW), Winterthur, Switzerland
- Venue
- IEEE Access
- Published
- 2025
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 94040-94056
- ISSN
- 2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4410491827
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 83
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5
- FWCI
- 30.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Zürcher Hochschule für Angewandte Wissenschaften digital collection (Zurich University of Applied Sciences) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- ZHAW Digital Collection
- Funders
- Innosuisse-Swiss Innovation Agency (108.047 IP-ICT)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Digital Accessibility for Disabilities
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Data Visualization and Analytics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Keywords
- screen readers, data visualization, visual impairment, assistive technology, deep learning models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review