Cited by 6Power System Optimization and StabilitySmart Grid Security and ResilienceSmart Grid and Power Systems

LBSCA: Learning Real-time Power System State Estimation Under Hidden Adversarial Attacks

Open access
Basulaiman, Kamal, Albeladi, Faisal, Almutairi, Faisal M., Saeed, Ahmed, Barati, Masoud·2025·IEEE Access

Abstract

Accurate power system state estimation (PSSE) is crucial for effective control and monitoring of power grids. However, existing techniques face numerous challenges including compromised measurements from cyber-attacks and the need for real-time operations. Traditional PSSE methods based on weighted least squares are susceptible to outliers and convergence issues, while convex relaxation techniques like semi-definite programming struggle with computational complexity. Recent deep learning approaches for PSSE are data-driven but unaware of the underlying physical constraints. This paper proposes a novel framework called learned block successive convex approximation (LBSCA) to address PSSE amidst hidden adversarial attacks. LBSCA utilizes an efficient block successive convex approximation algorithm that provably converges to a stationary point and can be learned via algorithm unrolling. The resulting deep neural network achieves real-time, end-to-end PSSE in fractions of a millisecond, even when attacks are unobserved and the network topology is incomplete. Evaluated on the IEEE 118-bus system under realistic noise profiles and stealthy directional and sparse injection attacks, LBSCA achieves lower state estimation errors by up to a factor of three than state-of-the-art deep learning baselines and delivers inference speeds up to four orders of magnitude faster than classical optimization algorithms. Our results demonstrate that model-driven unrolling of robust estimation yields both theoretical rigor and practical efficiency, underscoring its potential in improving real-time power system operation’s efficiency and security.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2025.3610609

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In several sensor-correlation-based studies, domain knowledge is encoded directly (e.g., power-flow relationships in smart grids, energy-conservation laws in manufacturing rigs) so that violations of physical consistency become a primary anomaly cue.

    “In several cases, domain knowledge is encoded directly-such as power-flow relationships in smart grids or energy-conservation laws in manufacturing rigs-so that violations of physical consistency become a primary anomaly cue [99,101,107].”
  • Other sensor-correlation-based models make correlations explicit through graph structures, digital twins, energy-based physics features, or multi-instance representations.

    “while others make correlations explicit through graph structures, digital twins, energy-based physics features, or multi-instance representations [94,96,99,101,104,106,107].”
  • Correlation-based methods are particularly suitable for attacks and faults that selectively perturb a subset of variables while keeping other measurements within nominal ranges, and for scenarios where the key symptom is a collapse or distortion of inter-sensor correlation rather than a large deviation of a single signal.

    “This makes them particularly suitable for attacks and faults that selectively perturb a subset of variables while keeping other measurements within nominal ranges, as well as for scenarios where the key symptom is a collapse or distortion of inter-sensor correlation rather than a large deviation of a single signal [94,96,99-101,106-108].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 57 · Cited by 6

Authors
Basulaiman, K., Albeladi, F., Almutairi, F. M., Saeed, A., & Barati, M.
Affiliations
  • King Saud University (SA)
  • King Abdulaziz University (SA)
  • Epsilon Data Management LLC, Irving, TX, USA
  • University of Business and Technology (SA)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2025
Volume
13
Pages
169340-169351
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4414229450
Cited by
6
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Power System Optimization and Stability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Smart Grid Security and Resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid and Power Systems
Keywords
power system state estimation, adversarial attacks, algorithm unrolling, deep neural network, real-time estimation, cyber attacks on power grids, robust estimation, IEEE 118-bus system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review