Cited by 4Natural Language Processing TechniquesArtificial Intelligence ApplicationsTopic Modeling

Minimizing Response Latency in LLM-Based Agent Systems: A Comprehensive Survey

Open access
Park, Gyeongmuk, Lee, Seonghyeon, Park, Yeonsu·2026·IEEE Access

Abstract

The advent of Large Language Model (LLM)-based agent systems represents a significant paradigm shift in Artificial Intelligence, enabling unprecedented capabilities in autonomous reasoning, planning, and interaction. However, the transformative potential of these agents is fundamentally constrained by a critical operational challenge: high response latency. This latency, which impairs usability, restricts real-time applicability, and challenges economic viability, is a paramount barrier to their widespread adoption in complex, real-world scenarios. This survey provides a comprehensive and structured analysis of the multifaceted latency problem in LLM-based agent systems. We present a structured taxonomy that deconstructs end-to-end latency into its constituent sources, offering a holistic view of the entire agent stack. Our review spans four primary layers of optimization: (1) Core LLM Inference, covering techniques to accelerate the foundational model, including quantization, pruning, efficient attention mechanisms, and speculative decoding; (2) Agent-Level Frameworks, detailing strategies to refine the agent’s cognitive loop, such as accelerating planning cycles, optimizing tool use, and implementing latency-aware memory management; (3) System-Level and Infrastructure, encompassing optimizations for the underlying deployment environment, including advanced serving systems, hardware acceleration, dynamic resource allocation, and distributed architectures; and (4) Multi-Agent…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/access.2026.3664226

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Park, G., Lee, S., & Park, Y.
Affiliations
  • Kangwon National University (KR)
  • Kyungpook National University (KR)
Venue
IEEE Access
Published
2026
Volume
14
Pages
26140-26168
ISSN
2169-3536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7128709910
Cited by
4
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
9.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
IEEE Access (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by Korean Government (RS-2023-00242528, RS-2025-00513098)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
LLM agents, response latency, latency reduction, LLM inference acceleration, quantization, pruning, efficient attention mechanisms, speculative decoding, planning optimization, memory management, hardware acceleration, dynamic resource allocation, distributed architecture, multi-agent systems, hardware-software co-design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review