The DOI matches its Crossref record.
TSGX: Defeating SGX Side Channel Attack with Support of TPM
Abstract
Intel SGX provides a new method for protecting private data in computer. However, the existence of SGX side channel attacks makes it possible for attackers to steal software internal data. In SGX side channel attacks, it is often necessary to restart the software repeatedly to observe the rule of software. So we give a new SGX defense method, which we call it as TSGX. TSGX combines TPM and SGX to build a reliable software restart counter, thereby preventing the software from being frequently started by SGX side channel attackers. The discussion showed that TSGX is able to effectively limit the number of software restart, making SGX side channel attacks more difficult to steal private data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Regarding commercial distributions, Red Hat Enterprise Linux ofers UAF and U2F functionality in RH-SSO via Keycloak [80], [131], while Oracle Linux Yum Server added FIDO2 functionality within 2021 [114].”
From How many FIDO protocols are needed? Analysing the technology, security and compliance (2024) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- arnautox, 2016, SCONE: Secure Linux containers with Intel SGX, Proceedings of the USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation (OSDI'02)
- suh, 2003, AEGIS: Architecture for Tamper-Evident and Tamper-Resistant Processing, Programming Languages and Systems
- 10.1145/1133058.1133063 · DOI
- xu, 2015, Controlled-Channel Attacks: Deterministic Side Channels for Untrusted Operating Systems, Security and Privacy, 640
- zhou, 0, Building tamper-resistant reboot counter without trusted running OS[C]// Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic & Automation Control Conference, IEEE
- ohrimenko, 2016, Oblivious multiparty machine learning on trusted processors, 25th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security16), 619
- 2006, Trusted Computing Group, TCG TPM Specification Version 1 2
- lee, 2011, Inferring fine-grained control flow inside sgx enclaves with branch shadowing, Memory deduplication as a threat to the guest OS[C]//Proc of the 4th European Workshop on System Security
- wenchang, 2014, Dcfi-checker checking kernel dynamic control flow integrity with performance monitoring counter, 11, 31
- parno, 0, Memoir: Practical State Continuity for Protected Modules[C]// 2011 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, IEEE
- 10.1145/1294261.1294294 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How many FIDO protocols are needed? Analysing the technology, security and compliance
Angelogianni, A., Politis, I., & Xenakis, C. (2024) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3654661 · Cited by 16
Metadata
- Authors
- Hongwei, Z., Zhipeng, K., Yuchen, Z., Dangyang, W., & Jinhui, Y.
- Affiliations
- PLA Information Engineering University (CN)
- PLA National Defence University (CN)
- Venue
- 2021 Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications Technology and Computer Science (ACCTCS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-01
- Pages
- 192-196
- OpenAlex
- W3162979535
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3
- FWCI
- 1.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia-Pacific Conference on Communications Technology and Computer Science (ACCTCS) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Security and Verification in Computing
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Digital Rights Management and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptographic Implementations and Security
- Keywords
- Intel SGX, side-channel attacks, Trusted Platform Module, data protection, trusted execution environments, attack defense
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review