Stress and emotion recognition using log-Gabor filter analysis of speech spectrograms
Abstract
We present new methods that extract characteristic features from speech magnitude spectrograms. Two of the presented approaches have been found particularly efficient in the process of automatic stress and emotion classification. In the first approach, the spectrograms are sub-divided into ERB frequency bands and the average energy for each band is calculated. In the second approach, the spectrograms are passed through a bank of 12 log-Gabor filters and the outputs are averaged and passed through an optimal feature selection procedure based on mutual information criteria. The proposed methods were tested using single vowels, words and sentences from SUSAS data base with 3 classes of stress, and spontaneous speech recordings made by psychologists (ORI) with 5 emotional classes. The classification results based on the Gaussian mixture model show correct classification rates of 40%-81%, for different SUSAS data sets and 40%-53.4% for the ORI data base.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Some recent methods in acoustic processing use Gabor-filter banks on sound spectra as a preprocessing step and achieve accurate results on acoustic processing tasks such as classification of environmental sounds, music genre recognition, and speech analysis.
“some recent methods in acoustic processing use Gabor-filter banks on the sound spectra as a preprocessing step, achieving accurate results on acoustic processing tasks, such as the classification of environmental sounds [41], music genre recognition [42], and speech analysis [43,44], to cite a few”
From A Survey of Underwater Acoustic Data Classification Methods Using Deep Learning for Shoreline Surveillance (2022) · cites this paper as [44]
Cites
Davis, B., Sheeber, L., Hops, H., & Tildesley, E. (2000) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1023/a:1005183622729 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Learning Affective Features With a Hybrid Deep Model for Audio–Visual Emotion Recognition
Zhang, S., Zhang, S., Huang, T., Gao, W., & Tian, Q. (2018) · IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology · doi:10.1109/tcsvt.2017.2719043 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Domingos, L. C. F., Santos, P. E., Skelton, P. S. M., Brinkworth, R. S. A., & Sammut, K. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22062181 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“on acoustic processing tasks, such as the classification of environmental sounds [41], music genre recognition [42], and speech analysis [43,44], to cite a few.”
Background
- Authors
- He, L., Lech, M., Maddage, N., & Allen, N.
- Affiliations
- RMIT University (AU)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Venue
- 2009 3rd International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and Workshops
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2009-09
- Pages
- 1-6
- ISSN
- 2156-8103 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050748687
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 4.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction and workshops (publishedVersion)
- RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Speech and Audio Processing
- Keywords
- stress detection, emotion recognition, log-Gabor filters, speech spectrograms, feature extraction, mutual information feature selection, Gaussian mixture model, spontaneous speech
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review