The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Deep neural network architectures for modulation classification
Open accessAbstract
In this work, we investigate the value of employing deep learning for the task of wireless signal modulation recognition. Recently in [1], a framework has been introduced by generating a dataset using GNU radio that mimics the imperfections in a real wireless channel, and uses 10 different modulation types. Further, a convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture was developed and shown to deliver performance that exceeds that of expert-based approaches. Here, we follow the framework of [1] and find deep neural network architectures that deliver higher accuracy than the state of the art. We tested the architecture of [1] and found it to achieve an accuracy of approximately 75% of correctly recognizing the modulation type. We first tune the CNN architecture of [1] and find a design with four convolutional layers and two dense layers that gives an accuracy of approximately 83.8% at high SNR. We then develop architectures based on the recently introduced ideas of Residual Networks (ResNet [2]) and Densely Connected Networks (DenseNet [3]) to achieve high SNR accuracies of approximately 83.5% and 86.6%, respectively. Finally, we introduce a Convolutional Long Short-term Deep Neural Network (CLDNN [4]) to achieve an accuracy of approximately 88.5% at high SNR.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474
Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1412.6980 · Cited by 98,946
Densely Connected Convolutional Networks
Huang, G., Liu, Z., Van Der Maaten, L., & Weinberger, K. Q. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.243 · Cited by 48,566
Convolutional, Long Short-Term Memory, fully connected Deep Neural Networks
Sainath, T. N., Vinyals, O., Senior, A., & Sak, H. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) · doi:10.1109/icassp.2015.7178838 · Cited by 1,678
Deep architectures for modulation recognition
West, N. E., & O'Shea, T. (2017) · 2017 IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks (DySPAN) · doi:10.1109/dyspan.2017.7920754 · Cited by 567
Radio Machine Learning Dataset Generation with GNU Radio
O’Shea, T. J. (2025) · TIB Data Manager · doi:10.57702/h54kawox · Cited by 303
Radio transformer networks: Attention models for learning to synchronize in wireless systems
O’Shea, T. J., Pemula, L., Batra, D., & Clancy, T. C. (2016) · Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ACSSC) · doi:10.1109/acssc.2016.7869126 · Cited by 98
Cited by
Peng, S., Sun, S., & Yao, Y.-D. (2022) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems · doi:10.1109/tnnls.2021.3085433 · Cited by 308
CNN-Based Automatic Modulation Classification for Beyond 5G Communications
Hermawan, A. P., Ginanjar, R. R., Kim, D.-S., & Lee, J.-M. (2020) · IEEE Communications Letters · doi:10.1109/lcomm.2020.2970922 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, X., Yang, D., & Gamal, A. E.
- Venue
- 2017 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-10
- Pages
- 915-919
- ISSN
- 1058-6393 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963809753
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 6.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Deep neural network architectures for modulation classification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/acssc.2017.8335483
- The paper
- Liu, X., Yang, D., & Gamal, A. E. (2017). Deep neural network architectures for modulation classification. 2017 51st Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers. https://doi.org/10.1109/acssc.2017.8335483
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.