Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 484

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Histogram refinement for content-based image retrieval

Pass, G., Zabih, R.·2002·Proceedings Third IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision. WACV'96

Abstract

Color histograms are widely used for content-based image retrieval. Their advantages are efficiency, and insensitivity to small changes in camera viewpoint. However, a histogram is a coarse characterization of an image, and so images with very different appearances can have similar histograms. We describe a technique for comparing images called histogram refinement, which imposes additional constraints on histogram based matching. Histogram refinement splits the pixels in a given bucket into several classes, based upon some local property. Within a given bucket, only pixels in the same class are compared. We describe a split histogram called a color coherence vector (CCV), which partitions each histogram bucket based on spatial coherence. CCVs can be computed at over 5 images per second on a standard workstation. A database with 15,000 images can be queried using CCVs in under 2 seconds. We demonstrate that histogram refinement can be used to distinguish images whose color histograms are indistinguishable.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/acv.1996.572008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 484

Metadata

Authors
Pass, G., & Zabih, R.
Venue
Proceedings Third IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision. WACV'96
Published
2002-12-24
Pages
96-102
ISSN
1550-5790 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2109325523
Cited by
484
References
0
FWCI
21.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Histogram refinement for content-based image retrieval. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/acv.1996.572008
The paper
Pass, G., & Zabih, R. (2002). Histogram refinement for content-based image retrieval. Proceedings Third IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision. WACV'96. https://doi.org/10.1109/acv.1996.572008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.