The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
State of Charge Estimation of Lithium-ion Battery Based on Recurrent Neural Network
Abstract
State of charge (SOC) is one of the key indices for battery management system (BMS). Accurate estimation of SOC can greatly improve battery safety performance and service life. Due to the complex electrochemical reaction inside the battery, SOC is highly nonlinear and cannot be directly measured. This paper proposes a SOC estimation method based on recurrent neural network (RNN). The input current and terminal voltage are selected as input parameters to predict SOC. The information transfer of RNN is mainly divided into two steps: from the input layer to the hidden layer and from the hidden layer to the output layer. To identify the internal parameters of RNN, RNN is firstly opened the feedback loop, and then closed the feedback loop after the training using the improved gauss-newton backpropagation algorithm. Through the cycle charge and discharge experiment of Lithium-ion battery, this paper trained 8 neural networks based on different training sets and predicted them with corresponding verification sets respectively. It was found that the experimental data were consistent with the predicted data, which verified the effectiveness of the method.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“RNNs and their variants, including long short-term memory (LSTM)[23] and gated recurrent units (GRUs)[24], are effective for sequence modeling, capturing the impact of historical measurements on the current SOC[25].”
From Advancements in the estimation of the state of charge of lithium-ion battery: a comprehensive review of traditional and deep learning approaches (2025) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 5 · Cited by 11
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- wenrong, 2018, SOC estimation of lithium -ion battery based on improved ampere-hour integral method, Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 42, 183
- shanshan, 2012, Research on Stateof-charge Estimation of LiFeP04 Battery
- kegang, 2019, Accurate estimation of charge state of lithium battery based on BP neural network, Electronic Design Engineering, 27, 61
- zhoucan, 2018, SOC Estimation of Lithium Battery Based on Improved Adaptive Unscented Kalman Filtering, Automobile Technology, 10
- chijian, 2016, Review of state of charge estimation methods for lithium battery, Chinese Journal of Power Sources, 40, 1318
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Z., Jia, W., Liu, T., Chang, Y., & Li, J.
- Affiliations
- Wuhan University of Technology (CN)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2020 Asia Energy and Electrical Engineering Symposium (AEEES)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-05
- Pages
- 742-746
- OpenAlex
- W3036140089
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Asia Energy and Electrical Engineering Symposium (AEEES) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Battery Modeling and Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Control Systems and Identification
- Keywords
- state of charge estimation, lithium-ion batteries, recurrent neural networks, battery management systems
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review