The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Allocating Power and Bandwidth in Multibeam Satellite Systems using Particle Swarm Optimization
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, communications satellites' payloads have been evolving from static to highly flexible components. Modern satellites are able to provide four orders of magnitude higher throughput than their predecessors forty years ago, going from a few Mbps to several hundreds of Gbps. This enhancement in performance is aligned with an increasing highly-variable demand. In order to dynamically and efficiently manage the satellite's resources, an automatic tool is needed. This work presents an implementation of a new metaheuristic algorithm based on Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) to solve the joint power and bandwidth allocation problem. We formulate this problem as a multi-objective approach that considers the different constraints of a communication satellite system. The evaluation function corresponds to a full-RF link budget model that accounts for adaptive coding and modulation techniques as well as multiple types of losses. We benchmark the algorithm using a realistic traffic model provided by a satellite communications operator and under time restrictions present in an operational environment. The results show a fast convergence of the PSO algorithm, reaching an admissible solution in seconds. However, the PSO tends to get stuck in local optima and often fails to reach the global optimum. This motivates the creation of a hybrid metaheuristic combining the presented PSO with a Genetic Algorithm (GA). We show that this approach dominates the PSO-only both in terms of power consumption and service rate. Furthermore, we also show that the hybrid implementation outperforms a GA-only algorithm for low run-time executions (10-second executions). The hybrid provides up to an 85% power reduction and up to 10% better service rate in this case.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“This results in a system where some beams lack the required capacity, i.e., not meeting the traffic demands, whereas other beams overcome the required capacity or, simply, wasting resources [176-178].”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
In the citing paper
“The authors in [177] analyzed and proposed the use of CNNs to manage the resources available in flexible payload architectures for DRM.”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [177]
Citations
Cites
A new optimizer using particle swarm theory
Eberhart, R., & Kennedy, J. (2002) · MHS'95. Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science · doi:10.1109/mhs.1995.494215 · Cited by 16,067
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- 10.4218/etrij.12.0211.0437 · DOI
- 10.1002/sat.1345 · DOI
- 10.1109/MEC.2013.6885504 · DOI
- 10.1109/LCOMM.2018.2844243 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10791-005-6619-y · DOI
- 10.1109/ICC.2010.5502506 · DOI
- 10.1109/AERO.2019.8742238 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11721-007-0002-0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1155/2008/685175 · DOI
- 10.4018/ACIR · DOI
- 10.1109/4235.996017 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TWC.2015.2402682 · DOI
- 10.1109/SIS.2003.1202250 · DOI
- 10.1109/AERO.2019.8741398 · DOI
- 10.1109/RWS.2008.4463619 · DOI
- 10.1109/NaBIC.2011.6089659 · DOI
- 10.1155/2014/780823 · DOI
- luis, 2019, Deep Reinforcement Learning Architecture for Continuous Power Allocation in High Throughput Satellites
- 10.1016/j.aeue.2017.05.012 · DOI
- 2017, Unleashing the Potential of an Empowered - World with the Launch of O3b mPOWER
- 10.1109/26.41158 · DOI
- stanley, 2017, Space Investment Implications of the Final Frontier
- 10.1109/AERO47225.2020.9172682 · DOI
- project, 2015, Implementation guidelines for the second generation system for broadcasting interactive services news gathering and other broadband satellite applications part 2 - s2 extensions (dvb-s2x)
- 10.1109/CEC.2002.1004388 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICEC.1998.699327 · DOI
- 10.1145/1570256.1570274 · DOI
- 10.1109/ICEC.1998.699146 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions
Oche, P. A., Ewa, G. A., & Ibekwe, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3132500 · Cited by 68
“This results in a system where some beams lack the required capacity, i.e., not meeting the traffic demands, whereas other beams overcome the required capacity or, simply, wasting resources [176-178].”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Pachler, N., Luis, J. J. G., Guerster, M., Crawley, E., & Cameron, B.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Venue
- 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-03
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 1095-323X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2981334798
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 9.95
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- IEEE Aerospace Conference (AERO) (publishedVersion)
- DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Satellite Communication Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Metaheuristic Optimization Algorithms Research
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Wireless Network Optimization
- Keywords
- multibeam satellite systems, power allocation, bandwidth allocation, particle swarm optimization, multi-objective optimization, hybrid metaheuristic, genetic algorithm, adaptive modulation and coding, energy consumption reduction, service rate
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Allocating Power and Bandwidth in Multibeam Satellite Systems using Particle Swarm Optimization. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172694
- The paper
- Pachler, N., Luis, J. J. G., Guerster, M., Crawley, E., & Cameron, B. (2020). Allocating Power and Bandwidth in Multibeam Satellite Systems using Particle Swarm Optimization. 2020 IEEE Aerospace Conference. https://doi.org/10.1109/aero47225.2020.9172694