Cited by 226Face recognition and analysisEmotion and Mood RecognitionFace and Expression Recognition

Automated facial expression recognition based on FACS action units

Lien, J.J., Kanade, T., Cohn, J.F., Ching-Chung Li·2002·Proceedings Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition

Abstract

Automated recognition of facial expression is an important addition to computer vision research because of its relevance to the study of psychological phenomena and the development of human-computer interaction (HCI). We developed a computer vision system that automatically recognizes individual action units or action unit combinations in the upper face using hidden Markov models (HMMs). Our approach to facial expression recognition is based an the Facial Action Coding System (FACS), which separates expressions into upper and lower face action. We use three approaches to extract facial expression information: (1) facial feature point tracking; (2) dense flow tracking with principal component analysis (PCA); and (3) high gradient component detection (i.e. furrow detection). The recognition results of the upper face expressions using feature point tracking, dense flow tracking, and high gradient component detection are 85%, 93% and 85%, respectively.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/afgr.1998.670980

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two-gray-level images of 100 to 200 pixels form a lower limit for detection of a face by a human observer.

    “It is generally believed that two-gray-levels images of 100 to 200 pixels form a lower limit for detection of a face by a human observer [75], [8].”
  • Interpretation of body language is situation-dependent.

    “Second, it is important to realize that the interpretation of the body language is situation-dependent [75].”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 226

Authors
Lien, J. J., Kanade, T., Cohn, J. F., & Li, C.-C.
Affiliations
University of Pittsburgh (US)
Venue
Proceedings Third IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition
Published
2002-11-27
Pages
390-395
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2145012698
Cited by
226
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.22
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Emotion and Mood Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face and Expression Recognition
Keywords
facial expression recognition, facial action units, facial action coding system, hidden Markov models, facial feature point tracking, principal component analysis, human-computer interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review