The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Kernel Eigenfaces vs. Kernel Fisherfaces: Face recognition using kernel methods
Abstract
Principal Component A nalysis and Fisher Linear Discriminant methods have demonstrated their success in fac edete ction, r ecognition and tr acking. The representations in these subspace methods are based on second order statistics of the image set, and do not address higher order statistical dependencies such as the relationships among three or more pixels. Recently Higher Order Statistics and Independent Component Analysis (ICA) have been used as informative representations for visual recognition. In this paper, we investigate the use of Kernel Principal Component Analysis and Kernel Fisher Linear Discriminant for learning low dimensional representations for face recognition, which we call Kernel Eigenface and Kernel Fisherface methods.While Eigenface and Fisherface methods aim to find projection directions based on second order correlation of samples, Kernel Eigenface and Kernel Fisherface methods provide generalizations which take higher order correlations into account. We compare the performance of kernel methods with classical algorithms such as Eigenface, Fisherface, ICA, and Support Vector Machine (SVM) within the context of appearance-based face recognition problem using two data sets where images vary in pose, scale, lighting and expression. Experimental results show that kernel methods provide better representations and achieve lower error rates for face recognition.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Turk, M., & Pentland, A. (1991) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1991.3.1.71 · Cited by 13,733
A Global Geometric Framework for Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction
Tenenbaum, J. B., Silva, V. D., & Langford, J. C. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2319 · Cited by 13,585
An Information-Maximization Approach to Blind Separation and Blind Deconvolution
Bell, A. J., & Sejnowski, T. J. (1995) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1995.7.6.1129 · Cited by 8,986
Martinez, A. M., & Kak, A. C. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.908974 · Cited by 3,249
Cited by
Face recognition using Laplacianfaces
He, X., Yan, S., Hu, Y., Niyogi, P., & Zhang, H.-J. (2005) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2005.55 · Cited by 3,264
Linear Regression for Face Recognition
Naseem, I., Togneri, R., & Bennamoun, M. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2010.128 · Cited by 1,012
Maximum Neighborhood Margin Discriminant Projection for Classification
Gou, J., Zhan, Y., Wan, M., Shen, X., Chen, J., & Du, L. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/186749 · Cited by 744
Independent component analysis of gabor features for face recognition
Liu, C., & Wechsler, H. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks · doi:10.1109/tnn.2003.813829 · Cited by 466
A Nonlinear Approach for Face Sketch Synthesis and Recognition
Liu, Q., Tang, X., Jin, H., Lu, H., & Ma, S. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.39 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, M.-H.
- Venue
- Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2002
- Pages
- 215-220
- OpenAlex
- W2021012145
- Cited by
- 704
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 16.09
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Kernel Eigenfaces vs. Kernel Fisherfaces: Face recognition using kernel methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/afgr.2002.4527207
- The paper
- Yang, M.-H. (2002). Kernel Eigenfaces vs. Kernel Fisherfaces: Face recognition using kernel methods. Proceedings of Fifth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face Gesture Recognition. https://doi.org/10.1109/afgr.2002.4527207
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.