Cited by 92Gait Recognition and AnalysisHuman Pose and Action RecognitionBiometric Identification and Security

Advances in automatic gait recognition

Nixon, M.S., Carter, J.N.·2004·Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings.

Abstract

Automatic recognition by gait is subject to increasing interest and has the unique capability to recognize people at a distance when other biometrics are obscured. Its interest is reinforced by the longstanding computer vision interest in automated non-invasive analysis of human motion. Its recognition capability is supported by studies in other domains such as medicine (biomechanics), mathematics and psychology, which continue to suggest that gait is unique. Further, examples of recognition by gait can be found in literature, with early reference by Shakespeare concerning recognition by the way people walk. Current approaches confirm the early results that suggested gait could be used for identification, and now on much larger databases. This has been especially influenced by the human ID at a distance research program with its wide scenario of data and approaches. Gait has benefited from the developments in other biometrics and has led to new insight particularly in view of covariates. As such, gait is an interesting research area, with contributions not only to the field of biometrics but also to the stock of new techniques for the extraction and description of objects moving within image sequences.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/afgr.2004.1301521

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gait recognition approaches are hard to hack compared with other biometric identification models.

    “Besides, gait recognition approaches possess some advantages regarding other biometric identification models, since hacking such architectures poses a hard task [71].”

    From Gait Recognition Based on Deep Learning: A Survey (2023) · cites this paper as [71]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nixon, M. S., & Carter, J. N.
Affiliations
University of Southampton (GB)
Venue
Sixth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, 2004. Proceedings.
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2004-06-10
Pages
139-144
ISSN
1541-5058 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100086166
Cited by
92
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 5
FWCI
13.05
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition (publishedVersion)
  • ePrints Soton (University of Southampton) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Gait Recognition and Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Signal Processing › Biometric Identification and Security
Keywords
gait recognition, biometrics, human motion analysis, gait database, covariates, image sequences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review