Cited by 6Misinformation and Its ImpactsSpam and Phishing DetectionHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

A Hybrid Approach for Identifying Authentic News Using Deep Learning Methods on Popular Twitter Threads

Abdullah All Tanvir, Mahir, Ehesas Mia, Huda, S M Asiful, Barua, Shuvo·2020·2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP)

Abstract

Now a day's social networks have become a crucial part and parcel in our day to day life. The gradual rise of the amount of information available in different kind of social media is the sole reason behind this impact. However, having the scope of accessing this huge amount of information so easily has made it complicated to find the contrast between counterfeit and an actual news. Some group of people often grabs this chance to share manipulated information to a huge number of people with an intent of destroying the image of any people, person or any specific groups. This results in creating such agendas which creates havoc to social welfare and peacefulness. Due to this fast circulation in such a small amount of time, it is almost impossible to manually detect the sources and authenticity of fake news effectively and efficiently. This is where computational and automated methods come handy to detect such kind of act in social media. We can decide whether any piece of text is either fabricated or not based on previously experienced real or fabricated news. In this study our contribution has three principal parts. First, we introduce our manually collected dataset and its details, then we go on to use some significant concepts of Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning models to train our model and lastly, we provided some comparison with the existing algorithms from different machine learning techniques which proves the superiority of our proposed model. Our model a…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/aisp48273.2020.9073583

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Fake news tends to have more complicated stories and hardly ever makes references.

    “Abdullah-All-Tanvir et al. (2020) reported that fake news tends to have more complicated stories and hardly ever make any references.”

    From Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Abdullah-All-Tanvir et al. 2020

  • Fake news is more likely to contain a greater number of words expressing negative emotions.

    “It is more likely to contain a greater number of words that express negative emotions.”

    From Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Abdullah-All-Tanvir et al. 2020

  • It is almost impossible to manually detect the sources and authenticity of fake news effectively and efficiently due to its fast circulation in a small amount of time.

    “Lastly, Abdullah-All-Tanvir et al. (2020) note that it is almost impossible to manually detect the sources and authenticity of fake news effectively and efficiently, due to its fast circulation in such a small amount of time.”

    From Fake news, disinformation and misinformation in social media: a review (2023) · cites this paper as Abdullah-All-Tanvir et al. 2020

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 13 · Cited by 6

Authors
Tanvir, A. A., Mahir, E. M., Huda, S. M. A., & Barua, S.
Affiliations
East West University (BD)
Venue
2020 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2020-01
Pages
1-6
OpenAlex
W3019443008
Cited by
6
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.59
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Signal Processing (AISP) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
fake news detection, news authenticity, Twitter threads, social media misinformation, Bayesian classifier, deep learning for text classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review