The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Balancing of peak currents between paralleled SiC MOSFETs by source impedances
Abstract
The peak switching currents of two paralleled MOSFETs turned on/off by one gate driver could differ significantly owing to the mismatch in threshold voltages (Vth). The passive balancing method described herein employs one inductor and one resistor per MOSFET to force the currents to track with negligible penalty in loss. Sensors, feedbacks, and knowledge of gate-related parameters (like gate charge, polarity of Vthdifference, gate impedances, etc.) are not required. The passive components are designed using an inequality involving Vth, rise time, and unbalance percentage. The mismatch in peak currents is reduced from 15% to 1% between SiC MOSFETs tested at 20 A and 300 V with 19% Vthvariation.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The mismatch of the Vth is the major cause of the transient imbalance current [25].”
From An Effective Current Balancing Method for Inverters With Paralleled Silicon Carbide Power Modules (2023) · cites this paper as [25]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 11
- 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2477831 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ECCE.2013.6646891 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPEL.2014.2304454 · DOI
- 10.1109/APEC.2013.6520216 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/IPEC.2010.5543851 · DOI
- 10.1109/TPS.2008.2003971 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/TPEL.2015.2408054 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/ECCE.2011.6064173 · DOI · Paper page
- gangyao, 2014, Dynamic and static behavior of packaged silicon carbide MOSFETs in paralleled applications, Appl Power Electron Conference and Exposition (APEC) 2014 Twenty-Ninth Annual IEEE, 1478
- 10.1109/TPEL.2012.2195332 · DOI
- 10.1109/ECCE.2009.5316038 · DOI
Cited by
An Effective Current Balancing Method for Inverters With Paralleled Silicon Carbide Power Modules
Lin, N., Zhao, Y., & Mantooth, H. A. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications · doi:10.1109/tia.2023.3306750 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Mao, Y., Miao, Z., Ngo, K. D. T., & Wang, C.-M.
- Venue
- 2017 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2017-03
- Pages
- 800-803
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.