Cited by 62Speech and dialogue systemsSpeech Recognition and SynthesisNatural Language Processing Techniques

Exploring ASR-free end-to-end modeling to improve spoken language understanding in a cloud-based dialog system,

Qian, Yao, Ubale, Rutuja, Ramanaryanan, Vikram, Lange, Patrick, Suendermann-Oeft, David, Evanini, Keelan, Tsuprun, Eugene·2017·2017 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)

Abstract

Spoken language understanding (SLU) in dialog systems is generally performed using a natural language understanding (NLU) model based on the hypotheses produced by an automatic speech recognition (ASR) system. However, when new spoken dialog applications are built from scratch in real user environments that often have sub-optimal audio characteristics, ASR performance can suffer due to factors such as the paucity of training data or a mismatch between the training and test data. To address this issue, this paper proposes an ASR-free, end-to-end (E2E) modeling approach to SLU for a cloud-based, modular spoken dialog system (SDS). We evaluate the effectiveness of our approach on crowdsourced data collected from non-native English speakers interacting with a conversational language learning application. Experimental results show that our approach is particularly promising in situations with low ASR accuracy. It can further improve the performance of a sophisticated CNN-based SLU system with more accurate ASR hypotheses by fusing the scores from E2E system, i.e., the overall accuracy of SLU is improved from 85.6% to 86.5%.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/asru.2017.8268987

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In more recent end-to-end approaches for dialogue modeling, speech and feedback recognition can be seen as a classification task from user behavior to the state of the system or to the value of specific slots in a slot-filling dialogue state.

    “In more recent end-to-end approaches for dialogue modeling, speech, and feedback recognition can be seen as a classification task from user behavior to the state of the system (Qian et al., 2017; Shi et al., 2017), or to the value of specific slots in a slot-filling dialogue state (Xu and Hu, 2018; Ma et al., 2020; Ouyang et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020).”

    From Modeling Feedback in Interaction With Conversational Agents—A Review (2022) · cites this paper as Qian et al., 2017

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 44 · Cited by 62

Authors
Qian, Y., Ubale, R., Ramanaryanan, V., Lange, P., Suendermann-Oeft, D., Evanini, K., & Tsuprun, E.
Affiliations
Educational Testing Service (US)
Venue
2017 IEEE Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding Workshop (ASRU)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2017-12
Pages
569-576
OpenAlex
W2786839803
Cited by
62
References
44
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.24
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding (ASRU) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech and dialogue systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
Keywords
spoken language understanding, spoken dialogue systems, non-native English speakers, crowdsourced data

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review