Time-domain neural network: A 48.5 TSOp/s/W neuromorphic chip optimized for deep learning and CMOS technology
Abstract
Demand for highly energy-efficient hardware for the inference computation of deep neural networks is increasing. Ultimately, fully spatially unrolled architecture where each distributed weight memory has a processing element (PE) for its exclusive use is the most energy-efficient solution because i) it can completely eliminate the energy-hungry data moving for weight fetching, and ii) PEs can consist only of combinational logics generally consuming less power than flip-flops. However, this strategy has not been applied because it requires a prohibitively huge amount of both area and hardware resources. We propose TDNN, which enables the fully spatially unrolled architecture by using 3D stacked ReRAM and the time-domain analog-digital mixed-signal processing that uses delay time as signal. In TDNN, a PE that performs synaptic operation is composed of only 12 logic transistors, which are equivalent to 3 gates. The proof-of-concept chip with SRAM instead of ReRAM shows unprecedentedly high energy efficiency of 48.2 TSop/s/W.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Recent analog neural network accelerators require considerable chip real-estate for calibration to counteract circuit fabrication variations.
“recent attempts at analog neural network accelerators demonstrate that considerable chip real-estate is required for calibration to counteract circuit fabrication variations.[Miyashita et al. 2016]”
From From memristors to compositional machine learning (2017) · cites this paper as Miyashita et al. 2016
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Yu, S., Gao, B., Fang, Z., Yu, H., Kang, J., & Wong, H.-S. P. (2012) · 2012 International Electron Devices Meeting · doi:10.1109/iedm.2012.6479018 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
From memristors to compositional machine learning
Nugent, A., & Molter, T. (2017) · Proceedings of the Neuromorphic Computing Symposium · doi:10.1145/3183584.3183615
“Additionally, recent attempts at analog neural network accelerators demonstrate that considerable chip real-estate is required for calibration to counteract circuit fabrication variations.[Miyashita et al. 2016]We point out that learning is calibration and that a solution to on-chip analog learningmay also be a soluti…”
Background
- Authors
- Miyashita, D., Kousai, S., Suzuki, T., & Deguchi, J.
- Affiliations
- Toshiba (Japan) (JP)
- Venue
- 2016 IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2016-11
- Pages
- 25-28
- OpenAlex
- W2587531421
- Cited by
- 25
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Asian Solid-State Circuits Conference (A-SSCC) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advanced Memory and Neural Computing
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Low-power high-performance VLSI design
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Analog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
- Keywords
- neuromorphic chips, CMOS technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review