Object Recognition in Forward Looking Sonar Images using Transfer Learning
Open accessAbstract
Forward Looking Sonars (FLS) are a typical choice of sonar for autonomous underwater vehicles. They are most often the main sensor for obstacle avoidance and can be used for monitoring, homing, following and docking as well. Those tasks require discrimination between noise and various classes of objects in the sonar images. Robust recognition of sonar data still remains a problem, but if solved it would enable more autonomy for underwater vehicles providing more reliable information about the surroundings to aid decision making. Recent advances in image recognition using Deep Learning methods have been rapid. While image recognition with Deep Learning is known to require large amounts of labeled data, there are data-efficient learning methods using generic features learned by a network pre-trained on data from a different domain. This enables us to work with much smaller domain-specific datasets, making the method interesting to explore for sonar object recognition with limited amounts of training data. We have developed a Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) based classifier for FLS-images and compared its performance to classification using classical methods and hand-crafted features.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A CNN pretrained with ImageNet and fine-tuned with a small sonar dataset achieved a maximum accuracy of 97% for classifying low-resolution forward-looking sonar images.
“The maximum accuracy achieved in this study was 97%, thus supporting the hypothesis that the feature-extraction process, obtained with pretrained CNN, was effective for classifying low-resolution FLS images.”
From A Survey of Underwater Acoustic Data Classification Methods Using Deep Learning for Shoreline Surveillance (2022) · cites this paper as [129]
Cites
Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition
He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.90 · Cited by 235,474 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Domingos, L. C. F., Santos, P. E., Skelton, P. S. M., Brinkworth, R. S. A., & Sammut, K. (2022) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s22062181 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
“Analogous to the work described in [88], a CNN was pretrained with images from the ImageNet dataset [51] and fine-tuned with a small sonar dataset for the classification of forward-looking sonar (FLS) data [129].”
MethodPre-trained Models for Sonar Images
Valdenegro-Toro, M., Preciado-Grijalva, A., & Wehbe, B. (2021) · OCEANS 2021: San Diego – Porto · doi:10.23919/oceans44145.2021.9705825 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Fuchs, L. R., Gallstrom, A., & Folkesson, J.
- Affiliations
- KTH Royal Institute of Technology (SE)
- Venue
- 2018 IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicle Workshop (AUV)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2018-11
- Pages
- 1-6
- OpenAlex
- W2951228273
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3
- FWCI
- 12.70
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- urn.kb.se
- Licence
- other-oa
- Locations
- IEEE/OES Autonomous Underwater Vehicles (publishedVersion)
- KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Underwater Acoustics Research
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Keywords
- forward-looking sonar, transfer learning, autonomous underwater vehicles, convolutional neural networks, obstacle avoidance, limited training data, sonar image classification
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review