DeepEpil: Towards an Epileptologist-Friendly AI Enabled Seizure Classification Cloud System based on Deep Learning Analysis of 3D videos
Open accessAbstract
Epilepsy is a major neurological disorder affecting approximately 1% of the world population, where seizure semiology is an essential tool for clinical evaluation of seizures. This includes qualitative visual inspection of videos from the seizures in epilepsy monitoring units by epileptologists. In order to support this clinical diagnosis process, promising deep learning-based systems were proposed. However, these indicate that video datasets of epileptic seizures are still rare and limited in size. In order to enable the full potential of AI systems for epileptic seizure diagnosis support and research, a novel collaborative development framework is proposed for a scalable DL-assisted clinical research and diagnosis support of epileptic seizures. The designed cloud-based approach integrates our deployed and tested NeuroKinect data acquisition pipeline into an MLOps framework to scale data set extension and analysis to a multi-clinical utilization. The proposed development framework incorporates an MLOps approach, to ensure convenient collaboration between clinicians and data scientists, providing continuous advantages to both user groups. It addresses methods for efficient utilization of HW, SW and human resources. In the future, the system is going to be expanded with several AI-based tools. Such as DL-based automated 3D motion capture (MoCap), 3D movement analysis support, quantitative seizure semiology analysis tools, video-based MOI and seizure classification.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Karácsony et al. [156] employed clinical Motion Capture to quantitatively analyze seizure-related symptoms and differentiate epilepsy syndromes, providing clinical localization and lateralization information.
“Karácsony et al. [156] employed clinical Motion Capture (MoCap) to quantitatively analyze seizure-related symptoms such as ictal head turning and upper limb automatisms, marking a pioneering discovery in differentiating epilepsy syndromes, providing clinical localization and lateralization information.”
From A Comprehensive Review on Synergy of Multi-Modal Data and AI Technologies in Medical Diagnosis (2024) · cites this paper as [156]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 23 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Karacsony, T., Loesch-Biffar, A. M., Vollmar, C., Noachtar, S., & Cunha, J. P. S.
- Affiliations
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-07-27
- Pages
- 1-5
- ISSN
- 2641-3590 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3191102210
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 23
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI ...) (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Epilepsy research and treatment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- epileptic seizure classification, seizure semiology, epilepsy monitoring unit, 3D video analysis, MLOps, 3D motion capture, automated video analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review