A Machine Learning Approach for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome
Abstract
The metabolic syndrome is one of the major public health challenges worldwide. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome vastly increases the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Metabolic Syndrome in general is under-diagnosed and often goes undetected for years. In this paper we present a machine learning based method for early detection of metabolic syndrome which uses only non-invasive features. We train and test our model based on data collected from a German population consisting of 2314 subjects (male = 918, female = 1396). Out of 2314 subjects 941 were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome (male = 441, female = 500). Features we consider include different anthropometric features (such as height, weight, waist circumference), medications, age, gender etc.; machine learning techniques we employed included gradient boosting machines, random forest, logistic regression and an ensemble model. We compare our models against the ones that were proposed in previous literature and outperform them in our cohort. We achieve area under the curve values (AUCs) of up to 0.90 with the ensemble classifier. The results achieved suggest that machine learning can be a valuable tool to predict metabolic syndrome with high discriminative power without relying on any invasive bio-markers, which significantly facilitates early detection.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ML methods have increasingly been applied to MetS prediction based on clinical and biochemical data, with encouraging outcomes across various populations.
“In recent years, ML methods have increasingly been applied to MetS prediction based on clinical and biochemical data, with encouraging outcomes across various populations [46–50].”
From Machine learning with the body roundness index and associated indicators: a new approach to predicting metabolic syndrome (2025) · cites this paper as [46]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 15
- Authors
- Datta, S., Schraplau, A., Freitas da Cruz, H., Philipp Sachs, J., Mayer, F., & Bottinger, E.
- Affiliations
- Hasso Plattner Institute (DE)
- University of Potsdam (DE)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-10
- Pages
- 933-940
- ISSN
- 2159-5410 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3000320523
- Cited by
- 15
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 1.42
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Keywords
- metabolic syndrome, non-invasive diagnosis, early detection, anthropometric features, waist circumference, gradient boosting, random forest, ensemble classifiers, logistic regression, cardiovascular risk, type 2 diabetes risk, German population
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review