Cited by 15Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsMachine Learning in Healthcare

A Machine Learning Approach for Non-Invasive Diagnosis of Metabolic Syndrome

Datta, Suparno, Schraplau, Anne, Freitas da Cruz, Harry, Philipp Sachs, Jan, Mayer, Frank, Bottinger, Erwin·2019·2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)

Abstract

The metabolic syndrome is one of the major public health challenges worldwide. Prevalence of metabolic syndrome vastly increases the risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases (CVDs). Metabolic Syndrome in general is under-diagnosed and often goes undetected for years. In this paper we present a machine learning based method for early detection of metabolic syndrome which uses only non-invasive features. We train and test our model based on data collected from a German population consisting of 2314 subjects (male = 918, female = 1396). Out of 2314 subjects 941 were diagnosed with metabolic syndrome (male = 441, female = 500). Features we consider include different anthropometric features (such as height, weight, waist circumference), medications, age, gender etc.; machine learning techniques we employed included gradient boosting machines, random forest, logistic regression and an ensemble model. We compare our models against the ones that were proposed in previous literature and outperform them in our cohort. We achieve area under the curve values (AUCs) of up to 0.90 with the ensemble classifier. The results achieved suggest that machine learning can be a valuable tool to predict metabolic syndrome with high discriminative power without relying on any invasive bio-markers, which significantly facilitates early detection.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bibe.2019.00175

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 15

Authors
Datta, S., Schraplau, A., Freitas da Cruz, H., Philipp Sachs, J., Mayer, F., & Bottinger, E.
Affiliations
  • Hasso Plattner Institute (DE)
  • University of Potsdam (DE)
Venue
2019 IEEE 19th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-10
Pages
933-940
ISSN
2159-5410 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000320523
Cited by
15
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.42
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
Keywords
metabolic syndrome, non-invasive diagnosis, early detection, anthropometric features, waist circumference, gradient boosting, random forest, ensemble classifiers, logistic regression, cardiovascular risk, type 2 diabetes risk, German population

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review