Cited by 15Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)Artificial Intelligence in HealthcareArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

Integrating automated knowledge extraction with large language models for explainable medical decision-making.

Zhang, Haodi, Li, Jiahong, Wang, Yichi, Song, Yuanfeng·2023·2023 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong reasoning ability and inspired many previously unimaginable applications. In this paper, we aim to harness the strong reasoning capability of LLMs toward explainable medical diagnosis. As we know, deep learning has been widely adopted and shown improvement in medical diagnostics. However, it is often criticized for its lack of interpretability. To address this drawback, we propose the first method that innovatively combines Markov logic networks (MLNs) with external knowledge extracted using LLMs, aiming for improved both interpretability and accuracy. Specifically, our approach involves a new process, powered by LLMs and a search engine, to automatically collect and organize external medical knowledge. The outcome is a set of first-order logic (FOL) rules, which then become a key component for the following MLN-based diagnostic algorithm. The resulting MLN-based model can maintain the accuracy of deep networks while providing understandable reasoning for its decisions. By aiming to blend specific knowledge from the medical domain with LLM techniques, our work contributes towards the development of improved automatic diagnosis systems, with the potential for enhancing transparency and trust in medical diagnostics.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bibm58861.2023.10385557

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured decoding approaches enforce interpretable reasoning pathways by construction, rather than hoping that prompted models will faithfully externalize their computations.

    “Structured decoding approaches [65,96,101,115,122] enforce interpretable reasoning pathways by construction, rather than hoping that prompted models will faithfully externalize their computations.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Li, J., Wang, Y., & Song, Y.
Affiliations
  • Shenzhen University (CN)
  • Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (HK)
Venue
2023 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2023-12-05
Pages
1710-1717
OpenAlex
W4390992265
Cited by
15
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 4
FWCI
2.66
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM) (publishedVersion)
  • Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
large language models, knowledge extraction, Markov logic networks, first-order logic rules, automatic knowledge acquisition, interpretability, clinical decision-making, search engines, automated diagnosis system

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review