The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction of Recurrence Probability of Thyroid Cancer Patients using Similarity Loss based Multi-modal Autoencoder
Abstract
Data used for the diagnosis of thyroid cancer patients include Thyroid Stimulating hormone (TSH), Thyroglobulin (Tg), Tg Antibodies (TgAb), and pathology information. However, existing thyroid cancer-related studies using machine learning tended to use a single type of data in model. Therefore, this study proposes a new model and method that can use all type of data together. The proposed method uses an autoencoder model composed of multiple encoders to extract comprehensive features from three types of hormone related data and pathology data and connects them to a classification layer to train them to be classified. As a result of the experiment, the proposed model using both types of hormonal and pathological data showed a performance improvement of up to about 58.1 times compared to the model using only a single type of data.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Some interesting examples include Kim and Shin (2023) that proposed a model employing an autoencoder with multiple encoders to extract comprehensive features from hormonal and pathological data and demonstrated that the proposed model significantly improves performance when compared to unimodal models when predicting the recurrence probability of thyroid cancer patients.”
From Navigating the landscape of multimodal AI in medicine: A scoping review on technical challenges and clinical applications (2025) · cites this paper as Kim and Shin, 2023
Citations
Cites
Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735 · Cited by 102,318
LSTM-based Encoder-Decoder for Multi-sensor Anomaly Detection
Malhotra, P., Ramakrishnan, A., Anand, G., Vig, L., Agarwal, P., & Shroff, G. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1607.00148 · Cited by 819
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Schouten, D., Nicoletti, G., Dille, B., Chia, C., Vendittelli, P., Schuurmans, M., Litjens, G., & Khalili, N. (2025) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2025.103621 · Cited by 162
Metadata
- Authors
- Kim, J., & Shin, H.
- Affiliations
- Ajou University,Dept. Artificial Intelligence,Suwon,Korea
- Ajou University (KR)
- ORCID
- Shin, Hyunjung
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-02
- Pages
- 358-360
- OpenAlex
- W4327928758
- Cited by
- 1
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 2.25
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Big Data and Smart Computing (BigComp) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- thyroid cancer, tumor recurrence prediction, similarity loss, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroglobulin, thyroglobulin antibodies, feature extraction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
