Mechanism Design for An Incentive-aware Blockchain-enabled Federated Learning Platform
Abstract
Recent technological evolution enables Artificial Intelligence (AI) model training by users' mobile devices, which accelerates decentralized big data analysis. In particular, Federated Learning (FL) is a key enabler to realize decentralized AI model update without user's privacy disclosure. However, since the behaviour of workers, who are assigned a training task, cannot be monitored, the state-of-the-art methods require a special hardware and/or cryptography to force the workers behave honestly, which hinders the realization. Furthermore, although blockchain-enabled FL has been proposed to give workers reward, any rigorous reward policy design has not been discussed. In this paper, to tackle these issues, we present a novel method using mechanism design, which is an economic approach to realize desired objectives under the situation that participants act rationally. The key idea is to introduce repeated competition for FL so that any rational worker follows the protocol and maximize their profits. With mechanism design, we propose a generic full-fledged protocol design for FL on a public blockchain. We also theoretically clarify incentive compatibility based on contest theory which is an auction-based game theory in economics.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 22 · Cited by 118
- Authors
- Toyoda, K., & Zhang, A. N.
- Affiliations
- Agency for Science, Technology and Research (SG)
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-12
- Pages
- 395-403
- OpenAlex
- W3007199357
- Cited by
- 118
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Cryptography and Data Security
- Keywords
- federated learning, blockchain, mechanism design, incentive compatibility, contest theory, reward policy, public blockchain
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review