Federated Learning for Object Detection in Autonomous Vehicles
Abstract
With the recent proliferation of Artificial Intelligence (AI), object detection is becoming increasingly ubiquitous. It is one of the key features of Autonomous Driving Systems. In current applications, object detection models are usually trained at a centralized location by collecting data from multiple sources. This raises concerns about data privacy among other issues. This paper addresses data privacy through a Federated Learning (FL) approach. FL architecture aims at preserving data privacy while maintaining performance by training the model in a decentralized manner. In this paper, we analyze how FL impacts the performance of object detection in a real-world traffic environment. We have constructed a prototype FL system and evaluated it on the KITTI Vision Benchmark 2D image dataset. In our prototype, object detection models are trained locally on a vehicle’s dataset, and the resultant weights are securely aggregated, using symmetric encryption techniques during data transfer, at the global server to yield an improved model. The FL model converged at 68% mean average precision. We compared the performance of object detection using FL to the traditional deep learning approach and noticed significant difference between the two models.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Collaboratively trained YOLO improved detection of distant objects like trucks and pedestrians using indirect data from other users.
“For instance, collaboratively trained YOLO improved detection of distant objects like trucks and pedestrians using indirect data from other users.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
The study in [54] demonstrated that FL architectures enhance object recognition at image boundaries by sharing aggregated model weights across vehicles.
“The study in [54] demonstrated that FL architectures enhance object recognition at image boundaries by sharing aggregated model weights across vehicles.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [54]
Cites
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 56,035 · see citing works
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803 · see citing works
Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Data
McMahan, H. B., Moore, E., Ramage, D., Hampson, S., & Arcas, B. A. Y. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1602.05629 · Cited by 14,215 · see citing works
Public-Key Cryptosystems Based on Composite Degree Residuosity Classes
Paillier, P. (2007) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/3-540-48910-x_16 · Cited by 7,250 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
FedRSC: A Federated Learning Analysis for Multi-Label Road Surface Classifications
Vondikakis, I. V., Panagiotopoulos, I. E., & Dimitrakopoulos, G. J. (2024) · IEEE Open Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/ojits.2024.3432176 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Despite various advances, high computational costs and complexity associated with HE still persist when integrating in PPML [2].”
- Authors
- Jallepalli, D., Ravikumar, N. C., Badarinath, P. V., Uchil, S., & Suresh, M. A.
- Affiliations
- San Jose State University (US)
- Venue
- 2021 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2021-08
- Pages
- 107-114
- OpenAlex
- W3206772271
- Cited by
- 56
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Big Data Computing Service and Applications (BigDataService) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
- Keywords
- federated learning, object detection, autonomous vehicles, data privacy, decentralized learning, symmetric encryption, autonomous driving perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review