Cited by 129Non-Invasive Vital Sign MonitoringWireless Body Area NetworksAdvanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials

Smart Jacket Design for Neonatal Monitoring with Wearable Sensors

Bouwstra, Sibrecht, Chen, Wei, Feijs, Loe, Oetomo, Sidarto Bambang·2009·2009 Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks

Abstract

Critically ill new born babies admitted at the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) are extremely tiny and vulnerable to external disturbance. Smart Jacket proposed in this paper is the vision of a wearable unobtrusive continuous monitoring system realized by body sensor networks (BSN) and wireless communication. The smart jacket aims for providing reliable health monitoring as well as a comfortable clinical environment for neonatal care and parent-child interaction. We present the first version of the neonatal jacket that enables ECG measurement by textile electrodes. We also explore a new solution for skin-contact challenges that textile electrodes pose. The jacket is expandable with new wearable technologies and has aesthetics that appeal to parents and medical staff. An iterative design process in close contact with the users and experts lead to a balanced integration of technology, user focus and aesthetics. We demonstrate the prototype and the experimental results obtained in clinical setting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/bsn.2009.40

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Textile-based sensors retain wired connections across the body, and their inability to support an intimate connection to the skin precludes reliable operation at clinical-grade levels of accuracy, particularly with motion.

    “Although textile-based sensors are of interest, these technologies retain wired connections across the body, and their inability to support an intimate connection to the skin precludes reliable operation at clinical-grade levels of accuracy, particularly with motion (5–7).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bouwstra, S., Chen, W., Feijs, L., & Oetomo, S. B.
Affiliations
  • Eindhoven University of Technology (NL)
  • Máxima Medisch Centrum (NL)
Venue
2009 Sixth International Workshop on Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2009-06
Pages
162-167
ISSN
2376-8886 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2120803666
Cited by
129
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 10
FWCI
21.11
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wearable and Implantable Body Sensor Networks (publishedVersion)
  • TU/e Research Portal (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Wireless Body Area Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Advanced Sensor and Energy Harvesting Materials
Keywords
smart jacket, neonatal monitoring, wearable sensors, wireless body area networks, textile electrodes, ECG measurement, neonatal intensive care, wireless communication, skin contact, parent-child interaction, user-centered design

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review