The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Affective Computing for Social Companion Robots Using Fine-grained Speech Emotion Recognition
Abstract
The increasing demand and diverse applications for social companion robots necessitate the development of more engaging and meaningful human-robot interactions and hence affective computing or emotion Al. In this paper, we propose a fine-grained speech emotion recognition using a state-of-the-art Deep Convolutional Neural Network trained on three-channel representations of speech signals to classify each emotion and also their intensity level. Experimental results on a publicly available dataset with intensity level (RAVEDESS) show that our method can effectively predict the users emotion and their intensity with 95.85±1.38% accuracy, a promising results towards empowering companion robots to be more affective and potentially be helpful in emotion regulations of their users.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Current AI systems can detect emotional cues and respond empathetically [1, 54, 61, 64].”
From Emotional Coregulation in Close Relationships with AI Agents: A Survey of ChatGPT and Replika Users (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1121/1.400476 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02943243 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0196391 · DOI
- 10.1109/PlatCon.2017.7883728 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9781119279860.ch2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10044-020-00921-5 · DOI
- 10.1561/1100000005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-3-031-19650-8_8 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-39262-7_64 · DOI
- lawrence, 2020, Improved Deep Neural Network with Age Augmentation for Facial Emotion Recognition in Social Companion Robotics, Journal of Comp Vision and Imaging Sys
- 10.1109/AEECA49918.2020.9213500 · DOI
- 10.1007/11573548_125 · DOI
- 10.5220/0010717500003061 · DOI
- anjum, 2021, Efficient Data Augmentation within Deep Learning Framework to Improve Cross-Dataset Facial Emotion Recognition, 25th International Conference on Image Processing Computer Vision Pattern Recognition
- 10.1016/j.procs.2020.08.027 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emotional Coregulation in Close Relationships with AI Agents: A Survey of ChatGPT and Replika Users
Pruss, E., Alimardani, M., Struijs, S., & Koole, S. L. (2025) · Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Agent Interaction · doi:10.1145/3765766.3765801 · Cited by 4
Lu, C.-K., Lu, C.-W., & Bo Lin, G. (2026) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2025.3621086 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahuja, S., & Shabani, A.
- Affiliations
- University of the Fraser Valley (CA)
- Venue
- 2023 IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2023-06
- Pages
- 331-332
- OpenAlex
- W4385489149
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 4.43
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE Conference on Artificial Intelligence (CAI) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Emotion and Mood Recognition
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Speech Recognition and Synthesis
- Keywords
- affective computing, speech emotion recognition, fine-grained emotion classification, emotion intensity estimation, human-robot interaction, deep convolutional neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
