The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Stability and optimality of distributed model predictive control
Abstract
This article extends existing concepts in linear model predictive control (MPC) to a unified, theoretical framework for distributed MPC with guaranteed nominal stability and performance properties. Centralized MPC is largely viewed as impractical, inflexible and unsuitable for control of large, networked systems. Incorporation of the proposed distributed regulator provides a means of achieving optimal systemwide control performance (centralized) while essentially operating in a decentralized manner. The distributed regulators work iteratively and cooperatively towards achieving a common, systemwide control objective. An attractive attribute of the proposed MPC algorithm is that all intermediate iterates are feasible and the resulting distributed MPC controllers stabilize the nominal closed-loop system. These two features allow the practitioner to terminate the distributed control algorithm at the end of each sampling interval, even if convergence is not attained. Distributed MPC with output feedback is addressed using the well established Kalman filtering framework for state estimation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Architectures for distributed and hierarchical Model Predictive Control – A review
Scattolini, R. (2009) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2009.02.003 · Cited by 1,293
(2013) · Dynamic Modelling and Predictive Control in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells: First Principle and Data‐Based Approaches · doi:10.1002/9781118501054.ch6 · Cited by 1,047
All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings
Drgoňa, J., Arroyo, J., Cupeiro Figueroa, I., Blum, D., Arendt, K., Kim, D., Ollé, E. P., Oravec, J., Wetter, M., Vrabie, D. L., et al. (2020) · Annual Reviews in Control · doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2020.09.001 · Cited by 1,020
Distributed Receding Horizon Control of Dynamically Coupled Nonlinear Systems
Dunbar, W. B. (2007) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2007.900828 · Cited by 388
RTO: An overview and assessment of current practice
Darby, M. L., Nikolaou, M., Jones, J., & Nicholson, D. (2011) · Journal of Process Control · doi:10.1016/j.jprocont.2011.03.009 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Venkat, A. N., Rawlings, J. B., & Wright, S. J.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-10-04
- Pages
- 6680-6685
- ISSN
- 0191-2216 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2107457089
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 27.91
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability and optimality of distributed model predictive control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cdc.2005.1583235
- The paper
- Venkat, A. N., Rawlings, J. B., & Wright, S. J. (2006). Stability and optimality of distributed model predictive control. Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2005.1583235
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.