The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Consensus Filters for Sensor Networks and Distributed Sensor Fusion
Abstract
Consensus algorithms for networked dynamic systems provide scalable algorithms for sensor fusion in sensor networks. This paper introduces a distributed filter that allows the nodes of a sensor network to track the average of n sensor measurements using an average consensus based distributed filter called consensus filter. This consensus filter plays a crucial role in solving a data fusion problem that allows implementation of a scheme for distributed Kalman filtering in sensor networks. The analysis of the convergence, noise propagation reduction, and ability to track fast signals are provided for consensus filters. As a byproduct, a novel critical phenomenon is found that relates the size of a sensor network to its tracking and sensor fusion capabilities. We characterize this performance limitation as a tracking uncertainty principle. This answers a fundamental question regarding how large a sensor network must be for effective sensor fusion. Moreover, regular networks emerge as efficient topologies for distributed fusion of noisy information. Though, arbitrary overlay networks can be used. Simulation results are provided that demonstrate the effectiveness of consensus filters for distributed sensor fusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Consensus Problems in Networks of Agents With Switching Topology and Time-Delays
Olfati-Saber, R., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2004.834113 · Cited by 12,788
Self-citationConsensus protocols for networks of dynamic agents
Saber, R. O., & Murray, R. M. (2004) · Proceedings of the 2003 American Control Conference, 2003. · doi:10.1109/acc.2003.1239709 · Cited by 901
Cited by
Consensus and Cooperation in Networked Multi-Agent Systems
Olfati-Saber, R., Fax, J. A., & Murray, R. M. (2007) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2006.887293 · Cited by 10,522
Self-citationDistributed event-triggered control for multi-agent systems
Dimarogonas, D. V., Frazzoli, E., & Johansson, K. H. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2011.2174666 · Cited by 2,556
Xiao, F., & Wang, L. (2008) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.2008.929381 · Cited by 734
Hou, Z.-G., Cheng, L., & Tan, M. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B (Cybernetics) · doi:10.1109/tsmcb.2008.2007810 · Cited by 668
Sayed, A. H. (2014) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2014.2306253 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Olfati-Saber, R., & Shamma, J. S.
- Venue
- Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2006-10-04
- Pages
- 6698-6703
- ISSN
- 0191-2216 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1498395183
- Cited by
- 982
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 33.80
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Consensus Filters for Sensor Networks and Distributed Sensor Fusion. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cdc.2005.1583238
- The paper
- Olfati-Saber, R., & Shamma, J. S. (2006). Consensus Filters for Sensor Networks and Distributed Sensor Fusion. Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control. https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2005.1583238
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.