The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Optimal kinodynamic motion planning using incremental sampling-based methods
Open accessAbstract
Sampling-based algorithms such as the Rapidly-exploring Random Tree (RRT) have been recently proposed as an effective approach to computationally hard motion planning problem. However, while the RRT algorithm is known to be able to find a feasible solution quickly, there are no guarantees on the quality of such solution, e.g., with respect to a given cost functional. To address this limitation, the authors recently proposed a new algorithm, called RRT*, which ensures asymptotic optimality, i.e., almost sure convergence of the solution returned by the algorithm to an optimal solution, while maintaining the same properties of the standard RRT algorithm, both in terms of computation of feasible solutions, and of computational complexity. In this paper, the RRT* algorithm is extended to deal with differential constraints. A sufficient condition for asymptotic optimality is provided. It is shown that the RRT* algorithm equipped with any local steering procedure that satisfies this condition converges to an optimal solution almost surely. In particular, simple local steering procedures are provided for a Dubins' vehicle as well as a double integrator. Simulation examples are also provided for these systems comparing the RRT and the RRT* algorithms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Real-Time Obstacle Avoidance for Manipulators and Mobile Robots
Khatib, O. (1986) · The International Journal of Robotics Research · doi:10.1177/027836498600500106 · Cited by 7,894
Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces
Kavraki, L. E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.-C., & Overmars, M. H. (1996) · IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation · doi:10.1109/70.508439 · Cited by 6,343
Nonlinear controllability and observability
Hermann, R., & Krener, A. (1977) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1977.1101601 · Cited by 2,374 · cited 1×
“However, any system that is locally controllable [21] satisfies Assumption 3.”
Background
Cited by
A Review of Motion Planning Techniques for Automated Vehicles
Gonzalez, D., Perez, J., Milanes, V., & Nashashibi, F. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · doi:10.1109/tits.2015.2498841 · Cited by 1,670
Polynomial Trajectory Planning for Aggressive Quadrotor Flight in Dense Indoor Environments
Richter, C., Bry, A., & Roy, N. (2016) · Springer Tracts in Advanced Robotics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-28872-7_37 · Cited by 747
Heuristic approaches in robot path planning: A survey
Mac, T. T., Copot, C., Tran, D. T., & De Keyser, R. (2016) · Robotics and Autonomous Systems · doi:10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.001 · Cited by 641
Survey of Robot 3D Path Planning Algorithms
Yang, L., Qi, J., Song, D., Xiao, J., Han, J., & Xia, Y. (2016) · Journal of Control Science and Engineering · doi:10.1155/2016/7426913 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Karaman, S., & Frazzoli, E.
- Venue
- 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-12
- Pages
- 7681-7687
- ISSN
- 0191-2216 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2071401582
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 7.15
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Optimal kinodynamic motion planning using incremental sampling-based methods. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cdc.2010.5717430
- The paper
- Karaman, S., & Frazzoli, E. (2010). Optimal kinodynamic motion planning using incremental sampling-based methods. 49th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). https://doi.org/10.1109/cdc.2010.5717430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.