Cited by 304Distributed Control Multi-Agent SystemsStochastic Gradient Optimization TechniquesOpinion Dynamics and Social Influence

Push-Sum Distributed Dual Averaging for convex optimization

Tsianos, Konstantinos I., Lawlor, Sean, Rabbat, Michael G.·2012·2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)

Abstract

Recently there has been a significant amount of research on developing consensus based algorithms for distributed optimization motivated by applications that vary from large scale machine learning to wireless sensor networks. This work describes and proves convergence of a new algorithm called Push-Sum Distributed Dual Averaging which combines a recent optimization algorithm [1] with a push-sum consensus protocol [2]. As we discuss, the use of push-sum has significant advantages. Restricting to doubly stochastic consensus protocols is not required and convergence to the true average consensus is guaranteed without knowing the stationary distribution of the update matrix in advance. Furthermore, the communication semantics of just summing the incoming information make this algorithm truly asynchronous and allow a clean analysis when varying intercommunication intervals and communication delays are modelled. We include experiments in simulation and on a small cluster to complement the theoretical analysis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cdc.2012.6426375

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • All prior work in distributed optimization, except for [30], [31], [32], [29], requires time-varying communications with some form of balancedness, often reflected in a requirement of having a sequence of doubly stochastic matrices commensurate with the sequence of underlying communication graphs.

    “All the prior work in distributed optimization, except for [30], [31], [32], [29], requires time-varying communications with some form of balancedness, often reflected in a requirement of having a sequence of doubly stochastic matrices that are commensurate with the sequence of underlying communication graphs.”

    From Distributed Optimization Over Time-Varying Directed Graphs (2015) · cites this paper as [31]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tsianos, K. I., Lawlor, S., & Rabbat, M. G.
Affiliations
McGill University (CA)
Venue
2012 IEEE 51st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2012-12
Pages
5453-5458
ISSN
0191-2216 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063403497
Cited by
304
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.20
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed Control Multi-Agent Systems
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Stochastic Gradient Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
Keywords
distributed optimization, convex optimization, consensus algorithms, asynchronous communication, communication delay, convergence analysis, wireless sensor networks, large-scale machine learning

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review