The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Assessment of Purposeful Movements for Post-Stroke Patients in Activites of Daily Living with Wearable Sensor Device
Abstract
Hemiparesis is one of the most frequent poststroke conditions, which causes muscle weakness and/or inability to move one side of the body. Physical rehabilitation is the main treatment for hemiparesis recovery, and physiotherapists agree that using the impaired arm in the activities of daily living (ADLs)is crucial for a complete recovery. Currently, rehabilitation is assessed through diaries and self-questionnaires, which are subjective and do not tell the real condition of the patients throughout the day. Assistive devices can objectively evaluate the functional improvement of the impaired arm monitoring its activity. This work aimed to identify the purposeful arm movements during patient's ADLs. We consider arm's swing while walking as a non-purposeful movement. Firstly, the event-based approach was applied to separate movement and non-movement segments. Secondly, movement segments were used to detect the change-point (events)and their locations in time series signal. Two machine learning classifiers, Support Vector Machine (SVM)and Artificial Neural Network (ANN), were trained using 10-fold cross validation for the classification of purposeful and non-purposeful movements. Data from 10 healthy and 12 post-strokes volunteers from Institute Guttmann (Barcelona)were collected using the SensHand device. The volunteers, wearing one SensHand on each wrist, performed the following activities: resting, eating, pouring water, drinking, brushing, folding towel, grasp towel, grasp brush, grasp glass, continuous and walking. Developing a model based on the healthy subjects, the overall classification accuracy obtained from SVM classifier and ANN was 81.21 % and 97.06% respectively. Similarly, with poststroke subjects obtained accuracy with the SVM and ANN was 84.18% and 99.74% respectively. Considering the whole dataset, SVM and ANN obtained maximum accuracy equal to 86.21 % and 99.91 % respectively. In conclusion, our work showed promising results for the classification of purposeful and non-purposeful movements.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Other researchers assessed the execution of ADLs [54,57] like different kitchen related activities or routine bedroom tasks.”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [57]
In the citing paper
“Besides, a common issue we found on the included papers when doing cohort studies is not recruiting AB participants that age-match the SP recruited [47,57]”
From Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review (2022) · cites this paper as [57]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 27
- 10.1109/TBME.2015.2477095 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.smhl.2018.07.027 · DOI
- 10.1177/1550147717707417 · DOI
- rovini, 2015, Empowering Patients in Self-Management of Parkinson's Disease through Cooperative ICT Systems, 251
- 10.1109/JSEN.2014.2357257 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00389-0 · DOI
- 10.3390/s16081341 · DOI
- 10.1080/01621459.2012.737745 · DOI
- zhao, 2018, Ultigesture: A wristband-based platform for continuous gesture control in healthcare, Smart Heal
- biomedica, 0, Identification and classification of motor activities using inertial sensors data Benish Fida
- 10.3109/03790799009166594 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.artmed.2018.06.003 · DOI
- 2017, The Burden of stroke in Europe: the challenge for policy makers, King's College London and Stroke Alliance for Europe
- 10.1016/j.smhl.2018.07.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.10.029 · DOI
- 10.1177/026921558700100409 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.28.10.1871 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61689-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6347388 · DOI
- 10.1161/01.STR.0000054630.33395.E2 · DOI
- garcia, 2016, Human activity recognition by inertial signals obtained from a smartphone
- 10.1109/ICTer.2012.6421415 · DOI
- 10.3390/jsan6040028 · DOI
- chih-wei hsu, 2003, A Practical Guide to Support Vector Classification, National Taiwan University
- 10.1109/ICRA.2017.7989370 · DOI
- 10.1109/TII.2016.2613683 · DOI
- 10.1109/JBHI.2019.2891729 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wearable sensors and machine learning in post-stroke rehabilitation assessment: A systematic review
Boukhennoufa, I., Zhai, X., Utti, V., Jackson, J., & McDonald-Maier, K. D. (2022) · Biomedical Signal Processing and Control · doi:10.1016/j.bspc.2021.103197 · Cited by 180
Metadata
- Authors
- Butt, A. H., Zambrana, C., Idelsohn-Zielonka, S., Claramunt-Molet, M., Ugartemendia-Etxarri, A., Rovini, E., Moschetti, A., Molleja, C., Martin, C., Salleras, E. O., & Cavallo, F.
- Affiliations
- Scuola Superiore Sant'Anna (IT)
- EURECAT Centre Tecnològic de Catalunya (ES)
- Institut Guttmann (ES)
- ORCID
- Venue
- 2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-07
- Pages
- 1-8
- OpenAlex
- W2968717862
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 1.54
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB) (publishedVersion)
- Florence Research (University of Florence) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Prosthetics and Rehabilitation Robotics
- Keywords
- stroke rehabilitation, hemiparesis, activities of daily living, wearable sensors, change point detection, support vector machine, artificial neural networks
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment of Purposeful Movements for Post-Stroke Patients in Activites of Daily Living with Wearable Sensor Device. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cibcb.2019.8791470
- The paper
- Butt, A. H., Zambrana, C., Idelsohn-Zielonka, S., Claramunt-Molet, M., Ugartemendia-Etxarri, A., Rovini, E., Moschetti, A., Molleja, C., Martin, C., Salleras, E. O., & Cavallo, F. (2019). Assessment of Purposeful Movements for Post-Stroke Patients in Activites of Daily Living with Wearable Sensor Device. 2019 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB). https://doi.org/10.1109/cibcb.2019.8791470