Cited by 73Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias

Multiscale entropy analysis of complex heart rate dynamics: discrimination of age and heart failure effects

Costa, M., Healey, J.A.·2003·Computers in Cardiology, 2003

Abstract

Quantifying the complexity of physiologic time series has been of considerable interest. Several entropy-based measures have been proposed, although there is no straightforward correspondence between entropy and complexity. These traditional algorithms may generate misleading results because an increase in system entropy is not always associated with an increase in its complexity, and because the algorithms are based on single time scales. Recently, we introduced a new method, multiscale entropy (MSE) analysis, to calculate entropy over a wide range of scales. In this study, we sought to determine whether loss of complexity due to aging could be distinguished from that due to major cardiac pathology. We analyzed RR time series from young subjects (n = 26), elderly subjects (n = 46) and subjects with congestive heart failure (n = 43). The mean MSE measures of each of the three groups revealed characteristic curves, suggesting that they capture fundamental changes in the heart rate dynamics due to age and disease. We used Fisher's linear discriminant to evaluate the use of MSE features for classification. In discriminant tests on the training data, we found that MSE features could separate elderly, young and heart failure subjects with 92% accuracy and that older healthy subjects (mean age = 65.9) could be separated from subjects with heart failure (mean age = 55.5) with 94% accuracy. Also, we discriminated data from heart failure subjects and elderly healthy subjects with a po…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cic.2003.1291253

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costa, M., & Healey, J. A.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Computers in Cardiology, 2003
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2003
Pages
705-708
ISSN
0276-6574 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128831967
Cited by
73
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.00
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Computers in cardiology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
Keywords
multiscale entropy, heart rate variability, RR interval time series, aging, congestive heart failure, physiological complexity, autonomic nervous system, elderly subjects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review