Cited by 105Video Surveillance and Tracking MethodsAdvanced Neural Network ApplicationsIoT and Edge/Fog Computing

Smart Surveillance as an Edge Network Service: From Harr-Cascade, SVM to a Lightweight CNN

Open access
Nikouei, Seyed Yahya, Chen, Yu, Song, Sejun, Xu, Ronghua, Choi, Baek-Young, Faughnan, Timothy·2018·2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)

Abstract

Edge computing efficiently extends the realm of information technology beyond the boundary defined by cloud computing paradigm. Performing computation near the source and destination, edge computing is promising to address the challenges in many delay-sensitive applications, like real-time human surveillance. Leveraging the ubiquitously connected cameras and smart mobile devices, it enables video analytics at the edge. In recent years, many smart video surveillance approaches are proposed for object detection and tracking by using Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) algorithms. This work explores the feasibility of two popular human-objects detection schemes, Harr-Cascade and HOG feature extraction and SVM classifier, at the edge and introduces a lightweight Convolutional Neural Network (L-CNN) leveraging the depthwise separable convolution for less computation, for human detection. Single Board computers (SBC) are used as edge devices for tests and algorithms are validated using real-world campus surveillance video streams and open data sets. The experimental results are promising that the final algorithm is able to track humans with a decent accuracy at a resource consumption affordable by edge devices in real-time manner.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cic.2018.00042

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compressing the DL model on the edge by reducing unnecessary filters in CNN layers can greatly reduce resource consumption of the edge layer while ensuring analysis performance.

    “The resource consumption of the edge layer can be greatly reduced while ensuring the analysis performance, by reducing the unnecessary filters in CNN layers [107].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nikouei, S. Y., Chen, Y., Song, S., Xu, R., Choi, B.-Y., & Faughnan, T.
Affiliations
  • Binghamton University (US)
  • University of Missouri–Kansas City (US)
Venue
2018 IEEE 4th International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2018-10
Pages
256-265
OpenAlex
W2893825256
Cited by
105
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 1
FWCI
3.99
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE International Conference on Collaboration and Internet Computing (CIC) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Video Surveillance and Tracking Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
Keywords
edge computing, video surveillance, human detection, histogram of oriented gradients, support vector machine, lightweight convolutional neural network, depthwise separable convolution, single-board computer, real-time video processing, campus surveillance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review