The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamic Region-Aware Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Geographic Inclusivity in Large Language Models
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) like GPT-3, BERT etc., have revolutionized natural language processing tasks across various domains. However, there exists a major challenge in LLMs, and it is Geographic bias. This bias illustrates the overrepresentation of Data only from certain parts of the world. This leads to digital exclusion of other regions and impacts the fairness, cultural sensitivity, and global applicability of AI systems. Traditional mitigation approaches, like data augmentation and bias-aware loss functions, often lack adaptability during fine-tuning. To address these gaps, a novel approach - Dynamic Region-Aware Fine-Tuning (DRAFT)is proposed. This method combines region-specific embeddings with dynamic sampling to reduce geographic bias during fine-tuning. By adjusting sampling probabilities based on region representation and embedding geographical context, DRAFT effectively reduces geographic bias. Experimental results indicate a 20% improvement in geographic diversity (Geographical Inclusion Index) and a decrease in bias (KL Divergence) without compromising accuracy. DRAFT thus offers a scalable solution for enhancing inclusivity and fairness in LLMs across diverse global regions.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Training data imbalances predict geographic bias in LLMs (Kumari et al., 2024), but the specific issue of DOI fabrication across different countries has received limited attention despite its im-portance for citation verification.”
From Geographic Variation in LLM DOI Fabrication: Cross-Country Analysis of Citation Accuracy Across Four Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Kumari et al., 2024
In the citing paper
“They proposed Dynamic Region-Aware Fine-Tuning (DRAFT), which uses region-specific embeddings and dynamic sampling to improve geographic representation by 20% without reducing model accuracy.”
From Geographic Variation in LLM DOI Fabrication: Cross-Country Analysis of Citation Accuracy Across Four Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as Kumari et al. (2024)
Citations
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 54,325
Don’t Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Tasks
Gururangan, S., Marasović, A., Swayamdipta, S., Lo, K., Beltagy, I., Downey, D., & Smith, N. A. (2020) · Proceedings of the 58th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.acl-main.740 · Cited by 2,103
Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Survey
Gallegos, I. O., Rossi, R. A., Barrow, J., Tanjim, M. M., Kim, S., Dernoncourt, F., Yu, T., Zhang, R., & Ahmed, N. K. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00524 · Cited by 1,245
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- Bolukbasi, 2016, Man is to computer programmer as woman is to homemaker? Debiasing word embeddings, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), 4349
- Radford, 2019, Language models are unsupervised multitask learners, OpenAI Blog
- Sheng, 2020, Towards controlled generation of text, 4207
- Gururangan, 2020, Counterfactual data augmentation for mitigating gender stereotypes in language models, 3543
- 10.1145/3306618.3317950 · DOI
- Wei, 2020, Dynamic sampling for large-scale imbalanced data, 1997
- Sheng, 2021, Geographical bias in language models: A case study on cuisine descriptions, 35, 14351
- Gururangan, 2020, Mitigating bias in pretrained language models using counterfactual data augmentation, 4625
- Zhu, 2021, Multilingual pretraining for mitigating bias in natural language models, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 73, 241
- Conneau, Unsupervised cross-lingual representation learning for multilingual models, 3102
- Zhang, 2022, Region-specific embeddings and dynamic sampling: Addressing geographic bias in large language models, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 34, 1001
- Wang, 2020, Dynamic region-aware fine-tuning for large language models, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21, 1
- Zhang, 2021, Bias mitigation in large language models through dynamic sampling and reweighting, IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, 3, 547
- Li, 2023, A Survey on Fairness in Large Language Models, arXiv preprint
- 10.18653/v1/2023.mrl-1.12 · DOI
Cited by
Kim, E., Kipchumba, F., & Min, S. (2025) · Publications · doi:10.3390/publications13040049 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumari, K. S., Shree, S. U., & Calarany, C.
- Affiliations
- Data Science and Business Systems, SRM Institue of Science and Technology,Kattankulathur,India
- Computer Science and Engineering, Rajiv Gandhi College of Engineering and Technology,Pondicherry,India
- Computer Science, Tagore Government Arts and Science College,Pondicherry,India
- Venue
- 2024 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2024-12-22
- Pages
- 1418-1423
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 3
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Dynamic Region-Aware Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Geographic Inclusivity in Large Language Models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cicn63059.2024.10847353
- The paper
- Kumari, K. S., Shree, S. U., & Calarany, C. (2024). Dynamic Region-Aware Fine-Tuning: Enhancing Geographic Inclusivity in Large Language Models. 2024 IEEE 16th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN). https://doi.org/10.1109/cicn63059.2024.10847353
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.