The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Local neighbourhood extension of SMOTE for mining imbalanced data
Abstract
In this paper we discuss problems of inducing classifiers from imbalanced data and improving recognition of minority class using focused resampling techniques. We are particularly interested in SMOTE over-sampling method that generates new synthetic examples from the minority class between the closest neighbours from this class. However, SMOTE could also overgeneralize the minority class region as it does not consider distribution of other neighbours from the majority classes. Therefore, we introduce a new generalization of SMOTE, called LN-SMOTE, which exploits more precisely information about the local neighbourhood of the considered examples. In the experiments we compare this method with original SMOTE and its two, the most related, other generalizations Borderline and Safe-Level SMOTE. All these pre-processing methods are applied together with either decision tree or Naive Bayes classifiers. The results show that the new LN-SMOTE method improves evaluation measures for the minority class.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
SMOTE synthetic minority over-sampling technique
Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., Hall, L. O., & Kegelmeyer, W. P. (2002) · Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research · doi:10.1613/jair.953 · Cited by 32,865
Cited by
A Survey of Predictive Modeling on Imbalanced Domains
Branco, P., Torgo, L., & Ribeiro, R. P. (2017) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/2907070 · Cited by 1,129
Learning Deep Representation for Imbalanced Classification
Huang, C., Li, Y., Loy, C. C., & Tang, X. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.580 · Cited by 988
Imbalanced Deep Learning by Minority Class Incremental Rectification
Dong, Q., Gong, S., & Zhu, X. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2018.2832629 · Cited by 369
Types of minority class examples and their influence on learning classifiers from imbalanced data
Napierala, K., & Stefanowski, J. (2016) · Journal of Intelligent Information Systems · doi:10.1007/s10844-015-0368-1 · Cited by 290
Self-citationA broad review on class imbalance learning techniques
Rezvani, S., & Wang, X. (2023) · Applied Soft Computing · doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2023.110415 · Cited by 281
Metadata
- Authors
- Maciejewski, T., & Stefanowski, J.
- Venue
- 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2011-04
- Pages
- 104-111
- OpenAlex
- W2167464971
- Cited by
- 255
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.02
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local neighbourhood extension of SMOTE for mining imbalanced data. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cidm.2011.5949434
- The paper
- Maciejewski, T., & Stefanowski, J. (2011). Local neighbourhood extension of SMOTE for mining imbalanced data. 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Data Mining (CIDM). https://doi.org/10.1109/cidm.2011.5949434
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.