The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A optimized YOLO method for object detection
Abstract
With the continuous breakthrough of object detection, there are many achievements in the combination field of computer science and mechanical automation. Especially in manufacturing industry, the object detection has played a great role in the weld inspection link during the production of vehicle wheels. The algorithm is used to align the weld on the wheel hub with the air sensor by identifying welds and rotate wheel hub in order to achieve the purpose of automatic inspection. The application of this technology can greatly Improve detection efficiency and accuracy, getting rid of the inconvenience caused by manual detection. There are few applications of object detection for wheel weld quality detection at present. The aim of this paper is to use improved YOLOv3 detector for vehicle wheel weld detecting applications to meet the needs of the industry. YOLOv3 as a one-stage deep learning-based approach, solves the shortcomings of traditional machine learning-based approach such as high time complexity and many redundant windows, which seriously affect the speed and performance of subsequent feature extraction and classification, since YOLO is one of the ends to end object detection algorithms. In this paper, we modify the original yolov3 model according to the actual situation of vehicle wheel weld. On the basis of the original model structure and layers, the paper uses Distance-IoU(DIoU) loss to improve the loss function of yolov3 and Non-maximum suppression using distance-IoU(DIoU-NMS) to eliminate the redundant candidate bounding boxes, which further accelerates the convergence speed of loss function and improves the accuracy of object detection(6.91-point higher than base model in AP50 and 3.61%-point higher in AP75).
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For detecting weld defects in vehicle wheels, this model achieved an mAP of 98.25% and 84.36% on AP 75 and AP 50, respectively. Environment-specific model.”
From The YOLO Framework: A Comprehensive Review of Evolution, Applications, and Benchmarks in Object Detection (2024) · cites this paper as [118]
Citations
Cites
ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., & Hinton, G. E. (2017) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/3065386 · Cited by 112,155
Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networks
Ren, S., He, K., Girshick, R., & Sun, J. (2017) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2016.2577031 · Cited by 73,472
You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection
Redmon, J., Divvala, S., Girshick, R., & Farhadi, A. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.91 · Cited by 53,803
Histograms of Oriented Gradients for Human Detection
Dalal, N., & Triggs, B. (2005) · 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2005.177 · Cited by 33,584
Object Detection via a Multi-region and Semantic Segmentation-Aware CNN Model
Gidaris, S., & Komodakis, N. (2015) · 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv.2015.135 · Cited by 801
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- nan, 2020, Improved Faster RCNN Based on Feature Amplification and Oversampling Data Augmentation for Oriented Vehicle Detection in Aerial Images, Remote Sensing 10 12, 2558
- joseph, 0, YOLO9000: better, faster, stronger, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 7263
- joseph, 2018, YOLOv3 An Incremental Improvement
- lichao, 2015, Densebox Unifying landmark localization with end to end object detection
- yihui, 2018, Softer-NMS Rethinking Bounding Box Regression for Accurate Object Detection
- hamid, 0, Generalized intersection over union: A metric and a loss for bounding box regression, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 658
- zhaohui, 2020, Distance-IoU Loss: Faster and Better Learning for Bounding Box Regression, AAAI, 12993
- wei, 2016, Ssd: Single shot multibox detector, European Conference on Computer Vision, 21
- 10.1023/A:1018628609742 · DOI
- ross, 0, Fast r-cnn, Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, 1440
- zhaowei, 0, Cascade r-cnn: Delving into high quality object detection, Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 6154
- 10.1109/ICCV.1999.790410 · DOI · Paper page
- changzheng, 2018, Face detection using improved faster rcnn
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ali, M. L., & Zhang, Z. (2024) · Computers · doi:10.3390/computers13120336 · Cited by 383
Metadata
- Authors
- Tianjiao, L., & Hong, B.
- Affiliations
- Beijing Union University (CN)
- Venue
- 2020 16th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2020-11
- Pages
- 30-34
- OpenAlex
- W3163464761
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
- FWCI
- 0.93
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- Locations
- International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Nature Science Foundation of China (61932012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Advanced Neural Network Applications
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Industrial Vision Systems and Defect Detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Object Detection Techniques
- Keywords
- YOLOv3, weld quality inspection, one-stage object detection, manufacturing automation, model optimization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A optimized YOLO method for object detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cis52066.2020.00015
- The paper
- Tianjiao, L., & Hong, B. (2020). A optimized YOLO method for object detection. 2020 16th International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Security (CIS). https://doi.org/10.1109/cis52066.2020.00015