The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cost-Optimal Scheduling in Hybrid IaaS Clouds for Deadline Constrained Workloads
Abstract
With the recent emergence of public cloud offerings, surge computing -outsourcing tasks from an internal data center to a cloud provider in times of heavy load- has become more accessible to a wide range of consumers. Deciding which workloads to outsource to what cloud provider in such a setting, however, is far from trivial. The objective of this decision is to maximize the utilization of the internal data center and to minimize the cost of running the outsourced tasks in the cloud, while fulfilling the applications' quality of service constraints. We examine this optimization problem in a multi-provider hybrid cloud setting with deadline-constrained and preemptible but non-provider-migratable workloads that are characterized by memory, CPU and data transmission requirements. Linear programming is a general technique to tackle such an optimization problem. At present, it is however unclear whether this technique is suitable for the problem at hand and what the performance implications of its use are. We therefore analyze and propose a binary integer program formulation of the scheduling problem and evaluate the computational costs of this technique with respect to the problem's key parameters. We found out that this approach results in a tractable solution for scheduling applications in the public cloud, but that the same method becomes much less feasible in a hybrid cloud setting due to very high solve time variances.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Buyya, R., Yeo, C. S., Venugopal, S., Broberg, J., & Brandic, I. (2009) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2008.12.001 · Cited by 5,937
Above the Clouds: A Berkeley View of Cloud Computing
Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A. D., Katz, R. H., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D. A., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I. G., et al. (2009) · Cited by 5,796
Brucker, P. (2004) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-24804-0 · Cited by 2,064
The Eucalyptus Open-Source Cloud-Computing System
Nurmi, D., Wolski, R., Grzegorczyk, C., Obertelli, G., Soman, S., Youseff, L., & Zagorodnov, D. (2009) · 2009 9th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Cluster Computing and the Grid · doi:10.1109/ccgrid.2009.93 · Cited by 1,782
Virtual Infrastructure Management in Private and Hybrid Clouds
Sotomayor, B., Montero, R. S., Llorente, I. M., & Foster, I. (2009) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2009.119 · Cited by 976
Cloud brokering mechanisms for optimized placement of virtual machines across multiple providers
Tordsson, J., Montero, R. S., Moreno-Vozmediano, R., & Llorente, I. M. (2012) · Future Generation Computer Systems · doi:10.1016/j.future.2011.07.003 · Cited by 356
Optimal virtual machine placement across multiple cloud providers
Chaisiri, S., Lee, B.-S., & Niyato, D. (2009) · 2009 IEEE Asia-Pacific Services Computing Conference (APSCC) · doi:10.1109/apscc.2009.5394134 · Cited by 331
Keahey, K., Tsugawa, M., Matsunaga, A., & Fortes, J. (2009) · IEEE Internet Computing · doi:10.1109/mic.2009.94 · Cited by 277
Resource-Constrained Project Scheduling: Past Work and New Directions 1
Geunes, B. Y., & O’Brien, W. J. (2001) · Cited by 54
Cited by
A survey on resource scheduling in cloud computing: issues and challenges
Singh, S., & Chana, I. (2016) · Journal of Grid Computing · doi:10.1007/s10723-015-9359-2 · Cited by 466
Perception of workload balance and employee job satisfaction in work organisations
Inegbedion, H., Inegbedion, E., Peter, A., & Harry, L. (2020) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03160 · Cited by 205
Metadata
- Authors
- Van den Bossche, R., Vanmechelen, K., & Broeckhove, J.
- Venue
- 2010 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2010-07
- Pages
- 228-235
- ISSN
- 2159-6190 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2066248324
- Cited by
- 334
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 16.87
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.