Cited by 68Brain Tumor Detection and ClassificationMedical Image Segmentation TechniquesAI in cancer detection

Current Trends on Deep Learning Models for Brain Tumor Segmentation and Detection – A Review

Somasundaram, S., Gobinath, R.·2019·2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon)

Abstract

Critical component in diagnosing tumor, designing treatment and developing an outcome for evaluating brain tumor segmentation needed to be highly accurate and reliable. Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) help and support the health care field to detect the very minor abnormal growth in any part of the human being. While deep neural networks (NNs) and machine learning techniques have good achievement in 2D image segmentations, but it's a challenging task for NNs to segment critical organs from 3D medical MR images. Segmentation relating tumor detection includes several processing techniques that are categorized into Pre-Processing, Segmentation, Optimization and Feature Extraction. Study focuses mainly on 3D-based Convolution neural network (CNN), ANN (Artificial Neural Networks), SVM and Multi-class Support vector machines (MCSVM) for Deeper Segmentation. To remove computational burden of processing 3D medical scans, this survey paper plan to review the current development in image segmentation and image classification based on efficient and effective towards processing of tumor infected human brain MRI adjacent image patches that can pass through the network with a target on gliomas, while robotically adapting towards an imbalance present in the data. Thus, more discriminative 3D NNs and Computational Machine learning that assists in processing the input images at multiple scales simultaneously. Finally, this article implying about present status on segmentation and Detection of tumor-based image processing through deep learning models.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comitcon.2019.8862209

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Somasundaram, S., & Gobinath, R.
Affiliations
Vels University (IN)
Venue
2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-02
Pages
217-221
OpenAlex
W2980308141
Cited by
68
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COM-IT-CON) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Brain Tumor Detection and Classification
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
Keywords
brain tumor segmentation, brain tumor detection, glioma, 3D convolutional neural networks, magnetic resonance imaging, medical image segmentation, class imbalance, multiscale image processing, support vector machine, artificial neural networks, image classification

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review