The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Machine Learning based Image Processing Techniques for Satellite Image Analysis -A Survey
Abstract
This paper presents the detailed comparison of various image processing techniques for analyzing satellite images. The satellite images are large in size, acquired from long distances and are affected by noise and other environmental conditions. Hence it is necessary to process them so that they can be used by the researchers for analysis. Satellite images are widely used in many real time applications such as in agriculture land detection, navigation and in geographical information systems. In this paper, a review of some popular machine learning based image processing techniques is presented. Also a detailed comparison of various techniques is performed. Limitations in each image processing method are also described. In addition to reviewing of different methods, different metrics for performance evaluation in each of the image processing areas is studied.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Parts of the image of no interest (e.g. those occluded by clouds) can be discarded so as to drastically reduce the amount of data transmitted [139],[15].”
From Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions (2024) · cites this paper as [139]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- zhang, 2017, Saliency detection and region of interest extraction based on multi-image common saliency analysis in satellite images, Neurocomputing, 1
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.01.012 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.aeue.2015.11.004 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ins.2017.09.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.ins.2016.02.021 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.04.015 · DOI
- singh, 2017, A novel optimally weighted framework of piecewise gamma corrected fractional order masking for satellite image enhancement, Computers and Electrical Engg, 1
- 10.1016/j.eswa.2016.03.032 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.sysarc.2015.11.006 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.11.009 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.10.010 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.asoc.2017.08.019 · DOI · Paper page
- pare, 2017, A new technique for multilevel color image thresholding based on modified fuzzy entropy and Levy flight firefly algorithm, Computers and Electrical Engg, 1
- chang, 2017, A flexible contrast enhancement method with visual effects and brightness preservation: Histogram planting, Computers and Electrical Engg, 1
- 10.1016/j.patcog.2017.06.036 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jvcir.2016.11.017 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.renene.2016.05.066 · DOI
- 10.1109/TGRS.2017.2743243 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2017.06.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cageo.2016.12.013 · DOI
Cited by
Applications and Challenges of Artificial Intelligence in Space Missions
Oche, P. A., Ewa, G. A., & Ibekwe, N. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2021.3132500 · Cited by 68
“However, among the evolutionary algorithms GA and PSO suffer from the limitation of getting trapped in local minima [138].”
BackgroundMethodInfluential
Metadata
- Authors
- Asokan, A., & Anitha, J.
- Affiliations
- Karunya University (IN)
- Venue
- 2019 International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COMITCon)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2019-02
- Pages
- 119-124
- OpenAlex
- W2979785627
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 7
- FWCI
- 10.03
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Machine Learning, Big Data, Cloud and Parallel Computing (COM-IT-CON) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Remote-Sensing Image Classification
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Satellite Image Processing and Photogrammetry
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image and Signal Denoising Methods
- Keywords
- satellite image analysis, machine learning image processing, image denoising, image segmentation, performance indicators, remote sensing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review