Cited by 19Network Security and Intrusion DetectionIoT and Edge/Fog ComputingAdversarial Robustness in Machine Learning

Distributed Threat Intelligence at the Edge Devices: A Large Language Model-Driven Approach

Open access
Hasan, Syed Mhamudul, Alotaibi, Alaa M., Talukder, Sajedul, Shahid, Abdur R.·2024·2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)

Abstract

With the proliferation of edge devices, there is a significant increase in attack surface on these devices. The decen-tralized deployment of threat intelligence on edge devices, coupled with adaptive machine learning techniques such as the in-context learning feature of Large Language Models (LLMs), represents a promising paradigm for enhancing cybersecurity on resource-constrained edge devices. This approach involves the deployment of lightweight machine learning models directly onto edge devices to analyze local data streams, such as network traffic and system logs, in real-time. Additionally, distributing computational tasks to an edge server reduces latency and improves responsiveness while also enhancing privacy by processing sensitive data locally. LLM servers can enable these edge servers to autonomously adapt to evolving threats and attack patterns, continuously updating their models to improve detection accuracy and reduce false positives. Furthermore, collaborative learning mechanisms facilitate peer-to-peer secure and trustworthy knowledge sharing among edge devices, enhancing the collective intelligence of the network and enabling dynamic threat mitigation measures such as device quarantine in response to detected anomalies. The scalability and flexibility of this approach make it well-suited for diverse and evolving network environments, as edge devices only send suspicious information such as network traffic and system log changes, offering a resilient and efficient solution to combat emerging cyber threats at the network edge. Thus, our proposed framework can improve edge computing security by providing better security in cyber threat detection and mitigation by isolating the edge devices from the network.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/compsac61105.2024.00206

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decentralised networks of agents may themselves be leveraged to assist with monitoring and detection, helping to localize anomalies and prevent breaches from cascading.

    “For example, decentralised networks of agents may themselves be leveraged to assist with monitoring and detection (Hasan et al., 2024), helping to localize anomalies and prevent breaches from cascading across the system.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. J. Wu, R. Antonova, A. Kan, M. Lepert, A. Zeng, S. Song, J. Bohg, S. Rusinkiewicz, and T. Funkhouser, "Tidybot: personalized robot assistance with large language models," Autonomous Robots, vol. 47, no. 8, p. 1087-1102, Nov. 2023. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10514-023-10139-z · DOI
  2. M. Conti, T. Dargahi, and A. Dehghantanha, Cyber threat intelligence: challenges and opportunities. Springer, 2018.
  3. R. David, J. Duke, A. Jain, V. J. Reddi, N. Jeffries, J. Li, N. Kreeger, I. Nappier, M. Natraj, S. Regev, R. Rhodes, T. Wang, and P. Warden, "Tensorflow lite micro: Embedded machine learning on tinyml systems," CoRR, vol. abs/2010.08678, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.08678 · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hasan, S. M., Alotaibi, A. M., Talukder, S., & Shahid, A. R.
Affiliations
Southern Illinois University Carbondale (US)
Venue
2024 IEEE 48th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference (COMPSAC)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2024-07-02
Pages
1496-1497
ISSN
0730-3157 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4396945094
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3
FWCI
8.32
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IEEE Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC) (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Network Security and Intrusion Detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
Keywords
edge computing security, large language models, in-context learning, cyber threat detection, anomaly detection, cooperative learning, resource-constrained edge devices, network traffic analysis, system log analysis, false positive reduction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review