The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A survey of security issues in wireless sensor networks
Abstract
Advances in wireless communication and electronics have enabled the development of low-cost, lowpower, multifunctional sensor nodes. These tiny sensor nodes, consisting of sensing, data processing, and communication components, make it possible to deploy Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs), which represent a significant improvement over traditional wired sensor networks. WSNs can greatly simplify system design and operation, as the environment being monitored does not require the communication or energy infrastructure associated with wired networks [1]. WSNs are expected to be solutions to many applications, such as detecting and tracking the passage of troops and tanks on a battlefield, monitoring environmental pollutants, measuring traffic flows on roads, and tracking the location of personnel in a building. Many sensor networks have mission-critical tasks and thus require that security be considered [2, 3]. Improper use of information or using forged information may cause unwanted information leakage and provide inaccurate results. While some aspects of WSNs are similar to traditional wireless ad hoc networks, important distinctions exist which greatly affect how security is achieved. The differences
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Handbook of applied cryptography
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-4512 · Cited by 10,357
NTRU: A ring-based public key cryptosystem
Hoffstein, J., Pipher, J., & Silverman, J. H. (1998) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/bfb0054868 · Cited by 1,947
Cited by
A Survey of Intrusion Detection Systems in Wireless Sensor Networks
Butun, I., Morgera, S. D., & Sankar, R. (2014) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/surv.2013.050113.00191 · Cited by 833
BBDS: Blockchain-Based Data Sharing for Electronic Medical Records in Cloud Environments
Xia, Q., Sifah, E., Smahi, A., Amofa, S., & Zhang, X. (2017) · Information · doi:10.3390/info8020044 · Cited by 579
A Survey on Emerging SDN and NFV Security Mechanisms for IoT Systems
Farris, I., Taleb, T., Khettab, Y., & Song, J. (2019) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2862350 · Cited by 402
Survey on secure communication protocols for the Internet of Things
Nguyen, K. T., Laurent, M., & Oualha, N. (2015) · Ad Hoc Networks · doi:10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.01.006 · Cited by 358
Luong, N. C., Hoang, D. T., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Kim, D. I., & Han, Z. (2016) · IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · doi:10.1109/comst.2016.2582841 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Attebury, G., & Ramamurthy, B.
- Venue
- IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
- Published
- 2006
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 2-23
- ISSN
- 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
- 2373-745X
- OpenAlex
- W2135988418
- Cited by
- 898
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 25.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.