Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,129

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Survey on Fundamental Limits of Integrated Sensing and Communication

Open access
Liu, An, Huang, Zhe, Li, Min, Wan, Yubo, Li, Wenrui, Han, Tony Xiao, Liu, Chenchen, Du, Rui, Tan, Danny Kai Pin, Lu, Jianmin, Shen, Yuan, Colone, Fabiola, Chetty, Kevin·2022·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

The integrated sensing and communication (ISAC), in which the sensing and communication share the same frequency band and hardware, has emerged as a key technology in future wireless systems due to two main reasons. First, many important application scenarios in fifth generation (5G) and beyond, such as autonomous vehicles, Wi-Fi sensing and extended reality, requires both high-performance sensing and wireless communications. Second, with millimeter wave and massive multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) technologies widely employed in 5G and beyond, the future communication signals tend to have high-resolution in both time and angular domain, opening up the possibility for ISAC. As such, ISAC has attracted tremendous research interest and attentions in both academia and industry. Early works on ISAC have been focused on the design, analysis and optimization of practical ISAC technologies for various ISAC systems. While this line of works are necessary, it is equally important to study the fundamental limits of ISAC in order to understand the gap between the current state-of-the-art technologies and the performance limits, and provide useful insights and guidance for the development of better ISAC technologies that can approach the performance limits. In this paper, we aim to provide a comprehensive survey for the current research progress on the fundamental limits of ISAC. Particularly, we first propose a systematic classification method for both traditional radio sensing (such as radar sensing and wireless localization) and ISAC so that they can be naturally incorporated into a unified framework. Then we summarize the major performance metrics and bounds used in sensing, communications and ISAC, respectively. After that, we present the current research progresses on fundamental limits of each class of the traditional sensing and ISAC systems. Finally, the open problems and future research directions are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2022.3149272

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,129

Metadata

Authors
Liu, A., Huang, Z., Li, M., Wan, Y., Li, W., Han, T. X., Liu, C., Du, R., Tan, D. K. P., Lu, J., Shen, Y., Colone, F., & Chetty, K.
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2022
Volume
24
Issue
2
Pages
994-1034
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W3155535021
Cited by
1,129
References
1
FWCI
98.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Survey on Fundamental Limits of Integrated Sensing and Communication. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2022.3149272
The paper
Liu, A., Huang, Z., Li, M., Wan, Y., Li, W., Han, T. X., Liu, C., Du, R., Tan, D. K. P., Lu, J., Shen, Y., Colone, F., & Chetty, K. (2022). A Survey on Fundamental Limits of Integrated Sensing and Communication. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2022.3149272

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.