Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 408

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 263 of the 263 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distributed Artificial Intelligence Empowered by End-Edge-Cloud Computing: A Survey

Duan, Sijing, Wang, Dan, Ren, Ju, Lyu, Feng, Zhang, Ye, Wu, Huaqing, Shen, Xuemin·2023·IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials

Abstract

As the computing paradigm shifts from cloud computing to end-edge-cloud computing, it also supports artificial intelligence evolving from a centralized manner to a distributed one. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive survey on the distributed artificial intelligence (DAI) empowered by end-edge-cloud computing (EECC), where the heterogeneous capabilities of on-device computing, edge computing, and cloud computing are orchestrated to satisfy the diverse requirements raised by resource-intensive and distributed AI computation. Particularly, we first introduce several mainstream computing paradigms and the benefits of the EECC paradigm in supporting distributed AI, as well as the fundamental technologies for distributed AI. We then derive a holistic taxonomy for the state-of-the-art optimization technologies that are empowered by EECC to boost distributed training and inference, respectively. After that, we point out security and privacy threats in DAI-EECC architecture and review the benefits and shortcomings of each enabling defense technology in accordance with the threats. Finally, we present some promising applications enabled by DAI-EECC and highlight several research challenges and open issues toward immersive performance acquisition.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/comst.2022.3218527

Cites

263 of 263 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 263 references

Research works printed but not linked: 58

  1. Vailshery, 2021, IoT and Non-IoT Connections Worldwide 2010–2025
  2. Badnakhe, 2021, IoT Is Not a Buzzword But Necessity
  3. 10.1002/9781119042655 · doi:10.1002/9781119042655
  4. 10.1109/TMC.2021.3119200 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2021.3119200
  5. Zheng, Asynchronous stochastic gradient descent with delay compensation, 4120
  6. Sun, Asynchronous coordinate descent under more realistic assumptions, 30, 6182
  7. Chen, Accelerating Gossip SGD with periodic global averaging, 1791
  8. Koloskova, Decentralized stochastic optimization and Gossip algorithms with compressed communication, 3478
  9. Assran, Stochastic gradient push for distributed deep learning, 344
  10. Abadi, TensorFlow: A system for large-scale machine learning, 265
  11. Paszke, Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library, 32, 8026
  12. 2020, MindSpore
  13. 2020, MegEngine: A Fast, Scalable and Easy-to-Use Deep Learning Framework
  14. Sergeev, 2018, Horovod: Fast and easy distributed deep learning in TensorFlow, arXiv:1802.05799 · arXiv
  15. 2018, MACE
  16. 2019, Deeplearning4j.
  17. 2022, JAX: Autograd and XLA
  18. Jiang, A unified architecture for accelerating distributed DNN training in heterogeneous GPU/CPU clusters, 463
  19. Markham, 2017, Caffe2: Portable High-Performance Deep Learning Framework From Facebook
  20. Chollet, 2021, Keras.
  21. 2018, Intel, AI. PlaidML.
  22. 2021, Introduction to Model Parallelism.
  23. Dean, Large scale distributed deep networks, 25, 1223
  24. Sun, Slim-DP: A multi-agent system for communication-efficient distributed deep learning, 721
  25. Alistarh, QSGD: Communication-efficient SGD via gradient quantization and encoding, 30, 1709
  26. 10.1109/MM.2019.2935967 · DOI
  27. Geng, Horizontal or vertical? A hybrid approach to large-scale distributed machine learning, 1
  28. Kim, SplitNet: Learning to semantically split deep networks for parameter reduction and model parallelization, 1866
  29. Chen, ScaleCom: Scalable sparsified gradient compression for communication-efficient distributed training, 33, 13551
  30. Wu, PocketFlow: An automated framework for compressing and accelerating deep neural networks, 1
  31. Vogels, PowerSGD: Practical low-rank gradient compression for distributed optimization, 32, 14236
  32. Howard, 2017, MobileNets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications, arXiv:1704.04861 · arXiv
  33. Liu, 2021, Hierarchical quantized federated learning: Convergence analysis and system design, arXiv:2103.14272 · arXiv
  34. Bonawitz, Towards federated learning at scale: System design, 1, 374
  35. McMahan, Communication-efficient learning of deep networks from decentralized data, 1273
  36. Park, Few-round learning for federated learning, 34, 28612
  37. 2018, EdgeTPU.
  38. 2018, The World’s First Full-Stack All-Scenario AI Chip.
  39. 10.1109/ISCAS45731.2020.9180843 · doi:10.1109/iscas45731.2020.9180843
  40. Narayanan, Accelerating deep learning workloads through efficient multi-model execution, 20
  41. Jiang, MainStream: Dynamic stem-sharing for multi-tenant video processing, 29
  42. Blanchard, Machine learning with adversaries: Byzantine tolerant gradient descent, 118
  43. Mhamdi, The hidden vulnerability of distributed learning in Byzantium, 3521
  44. Geyer, 2017, Differentially private federated learning: A client level perspective, arXiv:1712.07557 · arXiv
  45. Girgis, Shuffled model of differential privacy in federated learning, 2521
  46. Orekondy, 2018, Gradient-leaks: Understanding and controlling deanonymization in federated learning, arXiv:1805.05838 · arXiv
  47. Yan, Cache telepathy: Leveraging shared resource attacks to learn DNN architectures, 2003
  48. Zhu, Hermes attack: Steal DNN models with lossless inference accuracy, 1
  49. Xie, Practical distributed learning: Secure machine learning with communication-efficient local updates, 19
  50. 10.1088/1742-6596/1624/5/052017 · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1624/5/052017
  51. 10.1109/TII.2019.2940745 · doi:10.1109/tii.2019.2940745
  52. 10.1109/TLA.2021.9477277 · doi:10.1109/tla.2021.9477277
  53. 10.1109/JIOT.2019.2958097 · doi:10.1109/jiot.2019.2958097
  54. Organization, 2019, Towards Policy for Health and Ageing
  55. Xiao-Xu, Computing power network framework based on end-edge-supercloud collaboration, J. Comput. Appl.
  56. Telecom, 2019, Computing Power Network for MEC
  57. Mattsson, 2021, Machine Learning in Trusted Execution Environments and Quantum Computers
  58. 2020, Function Offload Coprocessors: A New Era of Decentralized and Distributed Computing

Cited by

See all 408

Metadata

Authors
Duan, S., Wang, D., Ren, J., Lyu, F., Zhang, Y., Wu, H., & Shen, X.
Venue
IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials
Published
2023
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
591-624
ISSN
  • 1553-877X (ISSN-L)
  • 2373-745X
OpenAlex
W4312588618
Cited by
408
References
263
FWCI
35.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Funders
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFF0604502)
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (62122095, 62002389, 62072472, U19A2067)
  • Grant from the Guoqiang Institute, Tsinghua University
  • Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2020JJ2050, 2021JJ20079)
  • Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST (YESS20200238)
  • Young Talents Plan of Hunan Province of China (2021RC3004)
  • Higher Education Discipline Innovation Project (B18059)
  • Central South University Innovation-Driven Research Programme (2023CXQD029)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distributed Artificial Intelligence Empowered by End-Edge-Cloud Computing: A Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/comst.2022.3218527
The paper
Duan, S., Wang, D., Ren, J., Lyu, F., Zhang, Y., Wu, H., & Shen, X. (2023). Distributed Artificial Intelligence Empowered by End-Edge-Cloud Computing: A Survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials. https://doi.org/10.1109/comst.2022.3218527

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.