Cited by 13Machine Fault Diagnosis TechniquesAnomaly Detection Techniques and ApplicationsFault Detection and Control Systems

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Mechanical Anomaly Detection on an Embedded Microcontroller

Lord, Mansoureh, Kaplan, Adam·2021·2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)

Abstract

This paper explores machine learning on an embedded device to detect anomalies with sophisticated low-power neural networks. We leverage this deep learning approach to detect mechanical anomalies as they occur on a top-load washing machine. We collect normal data from balanced laundry loads and abnormal data from unbalanced laundry loads, as they are being washed by the machine. The normal data is then used to train two different neural network models: autoencoder and variational autoencoder. This model is ported to an Arduino Nano microcontroller mounted to the washing machine. Using the autoencoder model, the microcontroller detects unbalanced washing machine loads with 92% accuracy, 90% precision and 99% recall. The battery life for this autoencoder model is 20 hours on 5 V lithium batteries, which is only 14.9% less than the life of a basic LED-blink application on the same platform.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/csci54926.2021.00159

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Authors in [135] developed a TinyML model deployed in STMicroelectronic STM32H743Z12 to detect anomalies in rotating machinery.

    “The authors in [135] developed TinyML model deployed in STMicroelectronic STM32H743Z12 to detect anomalies in rotating machinery.”

    From A Comprehensive Survey on TinyML (2023) · cites this paper as [135]

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 14 · Cited by 13

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. abadi, 0, TensorFlow: Large-scale machine learning on heterogeneous systems, software available from tensorflow org
  2. lord, 2021, TinyML Anomaly Detection, Master’s thesis
  3. pete warden, 2019, TinyML

Metadata

Authors
Lord, M., & Kaplan, A.
Affiliations
California State University, Northridge (US)
Venue
2021 International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2021-12
Pages
562-568
OpenAlex
W4285328131
Cited by
13
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.36
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Computational Science and Computational Intelligence (CSCI) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Machine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Fault Detection and Control Systems
Keywords
anomaly detection, mechanical fault detection, embedded machine learning, low-power neural networks, autoencoder, variational autoencoder, Arduino Nano, washing machines, battery life, edge computing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review