CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 12Web Application Security VulnerabilitiesInformation and Cyber SecurityWeb Applications and Data Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Security Evaluation of Wordpress Backup Plugins

Cernica, Ionul, Popescu, Nirvana, Tiganoaia, Bogdan·2019·2019 22nd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS)
DOI 10.1109/cscs.2019.00056
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Protecting the web applications is an important task for every organization. Wordpress is the most preferred content management system by organizations. In this paper we discuss why Wordpress is an important web application and the necessity of securing it. Another analyzed aspect regards the security of backup plugins created for Wordpress from the perspective of sensitive data leak, number of vulnerable modules, causes of vulnerability, most common mistakes and the impact of such vulnerabilities. Based on an experimental plan, the paper also emphasizes the destructive potential of those vulnerable backup plugins on the most relevant websites among the top ten million worldwide websites.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cscs.2019.00056

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1109/EUC.2018.00009 · DOI
  2. ristic, 2005, Apache Security
  3. 10.1109/CyberSecPODS.2018.8560666 · DOI
  4. 10.1109/SocialCom-PASSAT.2012.31 · DOI
  5. 2015, Cost of data breach study Global analysis
  6. trunde, 2015, WordPress security: an analysis based on publicly available exploits, iiWAS '15 Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services, 10.1145/2837185.2837195 · DOI
  7. 10.1201/1086/44797.13.5.20041101/84907.5 · DOI
  8. 10.1109/MS.2008.19 · DOI
  9. shema, 2012, Hacking Web Apps, 296
  10. akku?, 2010, Data recovery for web applications, 2010 IEEE/IFIP International Conference on Dependable Systems and Networks (DSN)
  11. huang, 2017, Web Application Security Threats Countermeasures and Pitfalls, 50, 81

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cernica, I., Popescu, N., & Tiganoaia, B.
Affiliations
  • University of Bucharest (RO)
  • Universitatea Națională de Știință și Tehnologie Politehnica București (RO)
ORCID
Popescu, Nirvana
Venue
2019 22nd International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2019-05
Pages
312-316
DOI
10.1109/cscs.2019.00056
OpenAlex
W2954467127
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.39
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Application Security Vulnerabilities
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information and Cyber Security
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Web Applications and Data Management
Keywords
WordPress, web application security, software vulnerabilities, sensitive data leakage, content management systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review