Representation and Extraction of Physics Knowledge Based on Knowledge Graph and Embedding-Combined Text Classification for Cooperative Learning
Abstract
Physical knowledge is the foundation of most engineering fields in particular such as product design, analysis, and operation and maintenance. However, due to the complexity of physical concepts, laws, and calculations, students can be easily overwhelmed by the conceptual ideas in the process of learning physics. This paper proposes a new way for helping students grasp the logical relation between the physics knowledge points based on neural networks and knowledge graph technology. Specifically, we use Python scripts to collect the articles about physics knowledge on the Internet as the raw data. After removing the special characters and other irrelevant text, the rest of the data is passed to several neural networks based on BERT and ERNIE for their effective and efficient classification into seven kinds of physics knowledge. The experimental results show that using ERNIE-BERT for embedding and using RCNN for the downstream model achieve the best performance. Knowledge graph is used to build a tree structure of physics knowledge, holding the physics knowledge picked out by the neural networks under corresponding nodes.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ORB can improve tasks such as learning embeddings and knowledge extraction in Physics, a domain where proper resources describing research-related knowledge seem to be very uncommon.
“Additionally, it can improve such specific tasks as learning embeddings and knowledge extraction in the discipline of Physics [Shang et al., 2022], domain in which the proper resources describing research-related knowledge seem to be very uncommon.”
From The Open Review-Based (ORB) dataset: Towards Automatic Assessment of Scientific Papers and Experiment Proposals in High-Energy Physics (2023) · cites this paper as [Shang et al., 2022]
Over three-quarters of LLMs studies (n = 89) are in the applied research stage (TRL-2).
“Over three-quarters of the LLMs studies (n = 89) are in the applied research stage (TRL-2), which aims to experiment with the capability of LLMs in automating different educational tasks by developing different models and combining LLMs with other machinelearning and deep-learning techniques (eg, RCNN (Shang et al., 2022)).”
From Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as Shang et al., 2022
Cites
BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding
Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019) · Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers) · doi:10.18653/v1/n19-1423 · Cited by 48,293 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Practical and ethical challenges of large language models in education: A systematic scoping review
Yan, L., Sha, L., Zhao, L., Li, Y., Martinez‐Maldonado, R., Chen, G., Li, X., Jin, Y., & Gašević, D. (2024) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.13370 · Cited by 935 · see citing works
“Over three-quarters of the LLMs studies (n=89) are in the applied research stage (TRL-2), which aims to experiment with the capability of LLMs in automating different educational tasks by developing different models and combining LLMs with other machine-learning and deep-learning techniques (e.g., RCNN (Shang et al.,…”
MethodSzumega, J., Bougueroua, L., Gkotse, B., Jouvelot, P., & Ravotti, F. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2312.04576 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
“Additionally, it can improve such specific tasks as learning embeddings and knowledge extraction in the discipline of Physics [Shang et al., 2022], domain in which the proper resources describing research-related knowledge seem to be very uncommon.”
Background
- Authors
- Shang, J., Huang, J., Zeng, S., Zhang, J., & Wang, H.
- Affiliations
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Venue
- 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2022-05-04
- Pages
- 1053-1058
- OpenAlex
- W4281400848
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 0.55
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Zhejiang University
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
- Keywords
- knowledge graphs, text classification, BERT, R-CNN, physics education, cooperative learning, knowledge representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review