Cited by 4Topic ModelingText and Document Classification TechnologiesSemantic Web and Ontologies

Representation and Extraction of Physics Knowledge Based on Knowledge Graph and Embedding-Combined Text Classification for Cooperative Learning

Shang, Jialin, Huang, Jingyuan, Zeng, Shihua, Zhang, Jian, Wang, Hongwei·2022·2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)

Abstract

Physical knowledge is the foundation of most engineering fields in particular such as product design, analysis, and operation and maintenance. However, due to the complexity of physical concepts, laws, and calculations, students can be easily overwhelmed by the conceptual ideas in the process of learning physics. This paper proposes a new way for helping students grasp the logical relation between the physics knowledge points based on neural networks and knowledge graph technology. Specifically, we use Python scripts to collect the articles about physics knowledge on the Internet as the raw data. After removing the special characters and other irrelevant text, the rest of the data is passed to several neural networks based on BERT and ERNIE for their effective and efficient classification into seven kinds of physics knowledge. The experimental results show that using ERNIE-BERT for embedding and using RCNN for the downstream model achieve the best performance. Knowledge graph is used to build a tree structure of physics knowledge, holding the physics knowledge picked out by the neural networks under corresponding nodes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1109/cscwd54268.2022.9776230

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ORB can improve tasks such as learning embeddings and knowledge extraction in Physics, a domain where proper resources describing research-related knowledge seem to be very uncommon.

    “Additionally, it can improve such specific tasks as learning embeddings and knowledge extraction in the discipline of Physics [Shang et al., 2022], domain in which the proper resources describing research-related knowledge seem to be very uncommon.”
  • Over three-quarters of LLMs studies (n = 89) are in the applied research stage (TRL-2).

    “Over three-quarters of the LLMs studies (n = 89) are in the applied research stage (TRL-2), which aims to experiment with the capability of LLMs in automating different educational tasks by developing different models and combining LLMs with other machinelearning and deep-learning techniques (eg, RCNN (Shang et al., 2022)).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shang, J., Huang, J., Zeng, S., Zhang, J., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
Zhejiang University (CN)
Venue
2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD)
Publisher
IEEE
Published
2022-05-04
Pages
1053-1058
OpenAlex
W4281400848
Cited by
4
References
1
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2
FWCI
0.55
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work in Design (CSCWD) (publishedVersion)
Funders
Zhejiang University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Text and Document Classification Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
knowledge graphs, text classification, BERT, R-CNN, physics education, cooperative learning, knowledge representation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review