The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cyber Sciences and Software Engineering
Abstract
This paper provides background and context for our planned presentation and discussion that will explore the emerging computing-based discipline of cyber sciences, focusing on its relationship to software engineering. We will also discuss the relationship of the Cyber Education Project to other related work, how educators can get involved, accreditation of cyber sciences degrees, and more. Results of our discussion will be provided to the Cyber Education Project.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“concerns remain since ethical ICT code of conduct compliance decision-making is often minimal or missing from the curriculum and is not provided to all students (Mead et al., 2015).”
From The influence of ethical principles and policy awareness priming on university students’ judgements about ICT code of conduct compliance (2022) · cites this paper as Mead et al., 2015
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 2015, National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE)
- 2015, The National Cybersecurity Workforce Framework
- 2015, About the CEP
- 2015, Ensemble Computing Portal Cyber Education Project
- 2015, National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) conference welcome
- 2015, About the CEP
- 2015, National Initiative for Cybersecurity Education (NICE) conference agenda
- 2015, About the CEP
- 2015, Ensemble Computing Portal Cyber Education Project
- hawthorne, 2015, Cyber Science An Emerging Discipline?
- 2015, Curricula Software Assurance Curriculum
- 2015, Software Assurance Cbkiprinciples Organization
- 2015, Graduate Software Engineering 2009
- 2015, Master of Software Engineering Reference Curriculum
- 2015, Master of Software Engineering Reference Curriculum
- 2010, Computer Society Recognizes Master of Software Assurance Curriculum
- 2015, National Centers of Academic Excellence - Cyber Operations
- 2015, National Centers for Academic Excellence in Information Assurance (IA)ICyber Defense (CD)
- 2015, Software Assurance Competency Model
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Richards, D., Nazeer Khan, S. B., Formosa, P., & Bankins, S. (2022) · Organizational Cybersecurity Journal: Practice, Process and People · doi:10.1108/ocj-01-2022-0001 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Mead, N. R., Gibson, D. S., & Hawthorne, E. K.
- Affiliations
- Software Engineering Institute (US)
- United States Air Force Academy (US)
- Union County College (US)
- Venue
- 2015 IEEE 28th Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training
- Publisher
- IEEE
- Published
- 2015-05
- Pages
- 21-23
- ISSN
- 1093-0175 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1548068281
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2022: 1 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 0.29
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering Education and Training (CSEE&T) (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Information Systems Education and Curriculum Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Engineering Education and Curriculum Development
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Science Applications › Teaching and Learning Programming
- Keywords
- cyberscience, software engineering, degree accreditation, computing education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
