The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Real-time closed-world tracking
Abstract
A real-time tracking algorithm that uses contextual information is described. The method is capable of simultaneously tracking multiple, non-rigid objects when erratic movement and object collisions are common. A closed-world assumption is used to adaptively select and weight image features used for correspondence. Results of algorithm testing and the limitations of the method are discussed. The algorithm has been used to track children in an interactive, narrative playspace.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., & Meer, P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1195991 · Cited by 4,560
W/sup 4/: real-time surveillance of people and their activities
Haritaoglu, I., Harwood, D., & Davis, L. S. (2000) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.868683 · Cited by 2,523
Metadata
- Authors
- Intille, S. S., Davis, J. W., & Bobick, A. F.
- Venue
- Proceedings of IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2002-11-22
- Pages
- 697-703
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105238356
- Cited by
- 256
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.30
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
