The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D trajectory recovery for tracking multiple objects and trajectory guided recognition of actions
Abstract
A mechanism is proposed that integrates low-level (image processing), mid-level (recursive 3D trajectory estimation), and high level (action recognition) processes. It is assumed that the system observes multiple moving objects via a single, uncalibrated video camera. A novel extended Kalman filter formulation is used in estimating the relative 3D motion trajectories up to a scale factor. The recursive estimation process provides a prediction and error measure that is exploited in higher-level stages of action recognition. Conversely, higher-level mechanisms provide feedback that allows the system to reliable segment and maintain the tracking of moving objects before, during, and after occlusion. The 3D trajectory, occlusion, and segmentation information are utilized in extracting stabilized views of the moving object. Trajectory-guided recognition (TGR) is proposed as a new and efficient method for adaptive classification of action. The TGR approach is demonstrated using "motion history images" that are then recognized via a mixture of Gaussian classifier. The system was tested in recognizing various dynamic human outdoor activities; e.g., running, walking, roller blading, and cycling. Experiments with synthetic data sets are used to evaluate stability of the trajectory estimator with respect to noise.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Self-organized formation of topologically correct feature maps
Kohonen, T. (1982) · Biological Cybernetics · doi:10.1007/bf00337288 · Cited by 9,529
Recognizing human action in time-sequential images using hidden Markov model
Yamato, J., Ohya, J., & Ishii, K. (2003) · Proceedings 1992 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1109/cvpr.1992.223161 · Cited by 1,273
Cited by
Yilmaz, A., Javed, O., & Shah, M. (2006) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1177352.1177355 · Cited by 4,792
Comaniciu, D., Ramesh, V., & Meer, P. (2003) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2003.1195991 · Cited by 4,560
Recent developments in human motion analysis
Wang, L., Hu, W., & Tan, T. (2003) · Pattern Recognition · doi:10.1016/s0031-3203(02)00100-0 · Cited by 962
Tracking multiple humans in complex situations
Zhao, T., & Nevatia, R. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2004.73 · Cited by 490
A survey of active and passive indoor localisation systems
Deak, G., Curran, K., & Condell, J. (2012) · Computer Communications · doi:10.1016/j.comcom.2012.06.004 · Cited by 408
Metadata
- Authors
- Rosales, R., & Sclaroff, S.
- Venue
- Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149)
- Publisher
- IEEE Comput. Soc
- Published
- 2003-01-20
- Pages
- 117-123
- ISSN
- 1063-6919 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2104706722
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.38
- Type
- conference paper
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D trajectory recovery for tracking multiple objects and trajectory guided recognition of actions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1109/cvpr.1999.784618
- The paper
- Rosales, R., & Sclaroff, S. (2003). 3D trajectory recovery for tracking multiple objects and trajectory guided recognition of actions. Proceedings. 1999 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (Cat. No PR00149). https://doi.org/10.1109/cvpr.1999.784618
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.